Quantitative analysis of a novel DNA hypermethylation panel using bronchial specimen for lung cancer diagnosis
Maosen Dou,Dan Li,Mengchan Zhu,Wei Guo,Changhong Miao,Min Li,Ying Xue,Ruiping He,Nan Jiang,Di Ge,Qin Hu,Yue Shao,Yingyong Hou,Xuefei Wang,Xingxu Huang,Tianshu Liu,Qi Wang,Yuehong Wang,Jiayuan Sun,Weibing Wang,Yuanlin Song,Jie Hu,Qihong Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34566
2023-05-28
International Journal of Cancer
Abstract:What's new? Bronchoscopy techniques to collect cell samples are a standard method for diagnosing lesions in the lungs, but often return non‐diagnostic results. Here, the authors demonstrate the clinical usefulness of a panel of three genes, HOXA7, SHOX2 and SCT, to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of bronchial brushing and washing. Quantitatively measuring the methylation of these three genes improved diagnostic sensitivity of the procedure as well as reducing false negatives, successfully distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules. The test is easy to perform and requires only a small amount of DNA, making it potentially useful in the clinic. Non‐diagnostic findings are common in transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial lung biopsy (EBUS‐TBLB). One of the challenges is to improve the detection of lung cancer using these techniques. To address this issue, we utilized an 850 K methylation chip to identify methylation sites that distinguish malignant from benign lung nodules. Our study found that a combination of HOXA7, SHOX2 and SCT methylation analysis has the best diagnostic yield in bronchial washing (sensitivity: 74.1%; AUC: 0.851) and brushing samples (sensitivity: 86.1%; AUC: 0.915). We developed a kit comprising these three genes and validated it in 329 unique bronchial washing samples, 397 unique brushing samples and 179 unique patients with both washing and brushing samples. The panel's accuracy in lung cancer diagnosis was 86.9%, 91.2% and 95% in bronchial washing, brushing and washing + brushing samples, respectively. When combined with cytology, rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE), and histology, the panel's sensitivity in lung cancer diagnosis was 90.8% and 95.8% in bronchial washing and brushing samples, respectively, and 100% in washing + brushing samples. Our findings suggest that quantitative analysis of the three‐gene panel can improve the diagnosis of lung cancer using bronchoscopy.
oncology