Abstract:The balance of work and family has received widespread attention from managers and researchers in recent years. Previous research claims that job demand, as a kind of pressure felt by employees, reduces employees' work motivation, increases employee fatigue and anxiety, and hinders work-family enrichment. However, different job demands (e.g., challenge demand and hindrance demand) have different effects on employees. Challenge demand, which gives individuals the opportunity to acquire new knowledge and promote personal growth, influences work-family enrichment in a complex way. However, few researches pay sufficient attention to the mechanism of the double-edged effect in the relationship between challenge demand and work-family enrichment. In addition, although scholarly research on job demand and work-family enrichment has increasingly focused on within-person fluctuations in recent years, how to examine the "dynamic" effects of challenge demand on work-family enrichment has received little attention. Therefore, based on conservation of resource theory and uncertainty management theory and from static and dynamic perspectives, we comprehensively examined the effects of challenge demand on work-family enrichment by clarifying the different attributes of challenge demand (daily level model, average level model, daily shift model, and variability model). We tested our hypothesis by conducting a diary study of 105 participations over 10 working days. Data were collected via a job demand scale, work absorption scale, relaxation scale, and work-family enrichment scale. First, we recorded control variables (gender, marital status, and spouse's work status) during the weekends. Second, researchers collected daily data (challenge demand, hindrance demand, work absorption, relaxation, and work-family enrichment) from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. each workday. Ultimately, 645 valid data points at the within-person level were available for 81 participants. Using SPSS 24.0, Mplus 7.0, and R software, we conducted a multilevel path analysis to examine the theoretical model. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the validity of the key variables (challenge demand, work absorption, relaxation, and work-family enrichment), and the results confirmed that the present study had good discriminant validity. The results of multilevel path analysis showed that the following. (1) In the static model, challenge demand had double-edged sword effects on work-family enrichment at the within-person level (daily level model); in the average level model (between-person level), the average level of challenge demand positively predicted chronic work absorption and negatively predicted chronic relaxation, and the mediating effect of chronic relaxation was stronger than that of chronic work absorption. (2) In the dynamic model, directionality of daily shifts in challenge demand negatively affected daily work absorption and daily relaxation in the daily shift model (within-person level). Only the mediating role of daily relaxation was significant; in the variability model (between-person level), the variability level of challenge demand had a negative impact on chronic work absorption and chronic relaxation, and only the mediating role of chronic relaxation was significant. The study makes critical contributions both theoretically and practically. (1) The static model indicated that, through the gained and deleted paths, the double-edged sword effect of the relationship between daily challenge demand, average level of change demand, and work- family enrichment was significant. (2) Through the dynamic model, this study explored the negative effect of challenge demand fluctuations on work- family enrichment in two forms, namely, daily shift directionality and the variability of challenge demand. Practically, this study suggests that managers should fully recognize the double- edged sword effect of challenge demand.

When Are Hindrance Stressors Challenging? the Roles of Political Skill and Stress Appraisals

The Challenge-Hindrance-Threat Appraisal Framework and the Differential Effects on Employees' Work Well-Being and Behaviors

How do employees appraise challenge and hindrance stressors? Uncovering the double-edged effect of conscientiousness.

Is Political Behavior a Viable Coping Strategy to Perceived Organizational Politics? Unveiling the Underlying Resource Dynamics

Empowering Leadership Boosts Employee Innovative Job Performance: Unraveling the Role of Work Stress and Regulatory Focus

The Impact of a Challenging Work Environment: Do Job Stressors Benefit Citizenship Behavior of Project Managers?

A Dynamic View of the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework: a Meta-Analysis of Daily Diary Studies

Is Role Stress Always Harmful? Differentiating Role Overload and Role Ambiguity in the Challenge-Hindrance Stressors Framework

Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Thriving at Work: The Mediating Roles of Challenge-Hindrance Stressors

Challenge-Hindrance Stress and Academic Achievement: The Moderating Effect of Proactive Personality

Challenge and hindrance appraisals of job demands: one man’s meat, another man’s poison?

An Examination of Interaction Between Transformational Leadership and Hindrance and Challenge Stressors for Nurses

In What Stressful Context Does Self-Efficacy Promote Job Performance? the Roles of Challenge–hindrance Stressors.

A Double‐edged Sword: the Moderating Role of Conscientiousness in the Relationships Between Work Stressors, Psychological Strain, and Job Performance

Political Skill: an Antidote in the Role Overload-Strain Relationship

What Differentiates Employees' Job Performance under Stressful Situations: the Role of General Self-Efficacy

For Better and Worse: How Proactive Personality Alters the Strain Responses to Challenge and Hindrance Stressors

Gain or Loss? Examining the Double-Edged Sword Effect of Challenge Demand on Work-Family Enrichment

The Impact of Challenge and Hindrance Stressors on Thriving at Work Double Mediation Based on Affect and Motivation

Does Time Stressor Promote or Inhibit Employees'Proactive Work Behavior?Cognitive Appraisals of Stress as Mediator and Time Management Skills as Moderator

All's well that ends well!? Moderating effects of goal progress on the relation between challenge and hindrance appraisal and well-being