Abstract:SAGE Open, Volume 13, Issue 4, October-December 2023. The competition between platforms supported by digital technology, to a great extent, affects the structure of the whole industry and the fate of individual enterprises in the industry. For related enterprises, it is very important to clarify the influencing factors of platform competition equilibrium. This paper constructs a game model that includes platforms, suppliers, and the final consumers. We analyze the condition and stability of each equilibrium and the impacts of the characteristics of the core and complementary products on the equilibrium by using the method of evolutionary game. Our results show the following: (1) If the two platforms initially have separate advantages in terms of the number of suppliers or consumers, there will be an equilibrium of the coexistence of the two platforms; otherwise, there will be an equilibrium of single platform dominating. (2) The equilibrium of a single platform dominating is more stable than that of the coexistence of multiple platforms. (3) The equilibrium of coexistence is more easily broken by the occasional shock of increasing or decreasing the number of suppliers than by consumers. (4) Platforms with poor core product quality and a high price for core and complementary products can coexist with other superior platforms only if the former has more consumers and suppliers at the beginning of the competition. This paper not only enriches the research content in the field of platform competition, but also provides new ideas for them to develop appropriate competition strategies in combination with their own conditions.Plain Language SummaryThe Evolutionary Game of Platform CompetitionThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the equilibrium state of platform competition in a dynamic market from a tripartite perspective of platform-supplier-consumer. This paper constructs a game model that includes platforms, suppliers, and the final consumers. We analyze the condition and stability of each equilibrium and the impacts of the characteristics of the core and complementary products on the equilibrium by using the method of evolutionary game. Our results show the following: (1) If the two platforms initially have separate advantages in terms of the number of suppliers or consumers, there will be an equilibrium of the coexistence of the two platforms; otherwise, there will be an equilibrium of single platform dominating. (2) The equilibrium of a single platform dominating is more stable than that of the coexistence of multiple platforms. (3) The equilibrium of coexistence is more easily broken by the occasional shock of increasing or decreasing the number of suppliers than by consumers. (4) Platforms with poor core product quality and a high price for core and complementary products can coexist with other superior platforms only if the former has more consumers and suppliers at the beginning of the competition. This paper not only enriches the research content in the field of platform competition, but also provides new ideas for them to develop appropriate competition strategies in combination with their own conditions. The limitation of this paper is that it does not consider the possibility of having companies enter or exit the industry.

The Divergent Effects of Platform Interfaces on Complementor Product Variety

Can Online Reviews Deter the Entry of New Complementors?

Effects of Complementors' Perceived Coopetition on Fostering Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Software Platforms

Leveraging interdependencies among platform and complementors in innovation ecosystem

Standardize or Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? Interface Design Coordination Between Software Platforms and Hosted Apps.

Platform Governance Design in Platform Ecosystems: Implications for Complementors' Multihoming Decision

Platform synergy and innovation speed of SMEs: The roles of organizational design and regional environment

Platforms Competition: An Ecosystem-View Analysis Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Growing Platforms within Platforms: How Platforms Manage the Adoption of Complementor Products in the Presence of Network Effects?

Managing product variety on online platform: Consumer heterogeneity and diseconomies of scope

User-Generated Feedback and New Complement Introductions: Evidence from a Sharing Economy App

Platform Heterogeneity, Platform Governance and Complementors’ Product Performance: an Empirical Study of the Mobile Application Industry

Digital Technology Use Decisions by Micro- and Small-Sized Complementors in Ecosystems: the Influence of Subjective Norms

Manufacturer encroachment in a platform supply chain: An analysis of synergy effect, dysergy effect, and mutual exclusivity effect

Dynamic Competition of Indirect Network Effects and Quality from Platforms Firms

Marketing Capability, Technology Capability and Complementor Performance: the Mediating Role of Platform Network Centrality

Manufacturer Encroachment with Competing Dual-Purpose Online Retail Platforms

How to Exploit the User Base for Online Products: A Product Integration Perspective

How optimal distinctiveness shapes platform complementors' adoption of boundary resources

The Varying Role of Regulation on the Interdependence between Platform Owners and Complementors

What is the Effect of Digital Platform Capabilities on the Opportunity Set? the Moderating Role of Governance Mechanisms