Abstract:We study a robust auction design problem with a minimax regret objective, in which a seller seeks a mechanism for selling multiple items to multiple bidders with additive values. The seller knows that the bidders’ values range over a box uncertainty set but has no information on their probability distribution. The robust auction design model we study requires no distributional information except for upper bounds on the bidders’ values for each item. This model is relevant if there is no trustworthy distributional information or if any distributional information is costly or time-consuming to acquire. We propose a mechanism that sells each item separately via a second price auction with a random reserve price and prove that this mechanism is optimal using duality techniques from robust optimization. We then interpret the auction design problem as a zero-sum game between the seller, who chooses a mechanism, and a fictitious adversary or “nature,” who chooses the bidders’ values from within the uncertainty set with the aim to maximize the seller’s regret. We characterize the Nash equilibrium of this game analytically when the bidders are symmetric. The Nash strategy of the seller coincides with the optimal separable second price auction, whereas the Nash strategy of nature is mixed and constitutes a probability distribution on the uncertainty set under which each bidder’s values for the items are comonotonic. We also study a restricted auction design problem over deterministic mechanisms. In this setting, we characterize the suboptimality of a separable second price auction with deterministic reserve prices and show that this auction becomes optimal if the bidders are symmetric. The optimal mechanism is derived in closed form and can easily be implemented by practitioners. History: Accepted by Andrea Lodi, Area Editor for Design & Analysis of Algorithms–Discrete. Funding: This research was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation [Grant BSCGI0_157733] and by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund Tier 2 [Grant MOE-T2EP20222-0003]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0275 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2022.0275 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ .

Dominant-Strategy Versus Bayesian Multi-item Auctions

On Solutions for the Maximum Revenue Multi-item Auction under Dominant-Strategy and Bayesian Implementations.

An N-to-1 Bidder Reduction for Multi-item Auctions and Its Applications

On Revenue Monotonicity in Combinatorial Auctions

Bayesian auctions with efficient queries

Multi-Unit Bayesian Auction with Demand or Budget Constraints.

On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms

On Revenue Maximization for Selling Multiple Independently Distributed Items.

Approximate Revenue Maximization with Multiple Items

Maximizing revenue in the presence of intermediaries

Discrete Single-Parameter Optimal Auction Design

Selling to Multiple No-Regret Buyers

Simultaneous Auctions with Synergies and Common Values

Asymmetry and Revenue in Second-Price Auctions: a Majorization Approach

A Multi-Dimensional Online Contention Resolution Scheme for Revenue Maximization

Simple Mechanisms for Profit Maximization in Multi-item Auctions

From Bayesian to Crowdsourced Bayesian Auctions.

Bounding the Optimal Revenue of Selling Multiple Goods

Regret Minimization and Separation in Multi-Bidder, Multi-Item Auctions

Impossibilities for Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms

Private Interdependent Valuations: New Bounds for Single-Item Auctions and Matroids