Abstract:Abstract Background Despite improvements in outcome following the addition of rituximab (R) to CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) (R-CHOP), patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 3-5 at diagnosis have a poor outcome. Enzastaurin is a potent inhibitor of PKCβ, a component of the B-cell receptor signaling complex, with preclinical activity and clinical activity in a phase II trial in patients with relapsed DLBCL, providing the rationale for this study in the primary therapy setting. Methods PRELUDE was a multi-national, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Patients were required to have a histologic diagnosis of DLBCL, pre-treatment IPI score ≥3, and a complete response (CR) or CRu by International Working Group Criteria, or a negative FDG-PET scan after 6–8 cycles of R-CHOP. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either enzastaurin 500 mg daily or an identical placebo as maintenance therapy, for a planned treatment duration of 3 years. The primary endpoint was DFS, defined as lack of disease progression or death. Assuming a 2-year DFS rate in the control group of 70%, the primary analysis had 80% power to detect a HR of 0.67, eg, a 2-year DFS rate of 79% in the enzastaurin group. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Data were analyzed 3 years after the last enrolled patient initiated treatment. Results From May 2006–April 2010, 758 patients were enrolled (enzastaurin, n=504; placebo, n=254). Median age at enrollment was 64 years (range 21-89); at diagnosis, 65% of patients had stage IV disease, 48% had B symptoms, and 25% had a mass >10 cm; baseline disease and patient characteristics were well balanced between treatment arms. Fifty-seven percent had a negative PET scan following completion of R-CHOP. Median follow-up time for all patients was 48 months (range 0.03–80). At the time of analysis, 209 events had occurred. The DFS HR for enzastaurin vs. placebo was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.22; 2-sided log-rank p=0.54). DFS at 24 and 48 months were 79% and 70% for the enzastaurin arm, and 75% and 71% for placebo, respectively. OS at 24 and 48 months was 87% and 81% for enzastaurin, and 89% and 82% for placebo; HR for enzastaurin vs. placebo was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.47; 2-sided log-rank p=0.81). Percent of ITT population patients on therapy at 12, 24, and 36 months was 70.6%, 60.6%, and 20.1% for enzastaurin; 72.3%, 60.6%, and 22.1% for placebo. Biomarker subgroup analysis was performed and will be available at time of presentation. Treatment emergent AEs (all grades) that were possibly study drug-related and significantly different between enzastaurin and placebo included chromaturia (18.5% vs. 0.4%), QTc prolongation (10.8% vs. 3.6%), and diarrhea (10.3% vs. 2.8%). There were no significant differences in number of patients with at least 1 grade 3 or higher AE between treatment arms. No significant differences were observed in the frequency of deaths while on therapy. Conclusion Enzastaurin did not improve DFS, EFS, or OS in patients with high-risk DLBCL and CR following R-CHOP treatment. Disclosures: Crump: Roche: Honoraria; Jansen-Ortho: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Off Label Use: rituximab for maintenance therapy post autolgous transplant for lymphoma. Leppä:Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Ogura:Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Rifkin:Millenium, Celgene, ONYX: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mackensen:Eli Lilly: Consultancy. Offner:Eli Lilly: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Smith:Genentech, Celgene, Spectrum, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, Amgen/Micronet: Consultancy. Tobinai:Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Hahka-Kemppinen:Eli Lilly: Employment. Thornton:Eli Lilly: Employment. Shi:Eli Lilly: Employment. Lin:Eli Lilly: Employment. Kahl:Genentech: Consultancy. Savage:Eli Lilly: Consultancy.

Preliminary results of a randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed (P) + carboplatin (Cb) ± enzastaurin (ENZ) versus docetaxel (D) + Cb as first-line treatment of patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Final results of a randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed (P) + carboplatin (Cb) ± enzastaurin (E) versus docetaxel (D) + Cb as first-line treatment of patients (pts) with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

1263P Tislelizumab + Chemotherapy Vs Chemotherapy Alone As First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced/metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel-Carboplatin (TC) Alone or with Endostatin for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

[A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial Comparing Pemetrexed/cisplatin and Gemcitabine/cisplatin As First-Line Treatment for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer].

Pemetrexed and Platinum with or Without Pembrolizumab for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Tki)-Resistant, EGFR-mutant, Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC: Phase 3 KEYNOTE-789 Study

ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab or Placebo in Combination with Adjuvant Chemotherapy With/without Radiotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Abstract CT253: Results from KEYNOTE-B99: Phase 2 study of first-line (1L) pembrolizumab (pembro) plus investigational agents and chemotherapy (chemo) for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

1036P Anlotinib Plus Docetaxel Vs. Docetaxel As 2Nd-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Updated Results from ALTER-L016

Update results of paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with anlotinib as first-line regimen for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

Updated results of paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced ESCC: A multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

A phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin plus PD-1 inhibitors combined with anlotinib as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer.

Randomized phase II clinical trial of cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (CE) alone or in combination with nivolumab as frontline therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): ECOG-ACRIN EA5161.

Nedaplatin Plus Docetaxel Versus Cisplatin Plus Docetaxel As First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung - A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial.

Abstract CT256: Results from KEYNOTE-B98: A phase 1b/2 study of pembrolizumab plus investigational agents in patients with anti-PD-(L)1-refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

Update results of paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with anlotinib as first-line regimen for patients with advanced ESCC: A multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

A multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of anlotinib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in EGFR-negative NSCLC patients after progression on first-line platinum-base chemotherapy: ALTER-L018.

Eicosanoid Modulation in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (nsclc): Calgb 30203.

A Phase Iii Study Of Enzastaurin In Patients With High-Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Following Response To Primary Treatment: The Prelude Trial

Three days of CIV rh-Endostatin in combination with PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy as first-line regimen for EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic, non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A open label, multicenter, phase II and cohort study (ENPOWER).

Anlotinib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updated results from a phase I/II study.