Abstract:Short-range and long-range contacts are important in forming protein structure. The proteins can be grouped into four different structural classes according to the content and topology of alpha-helices and beta-strands, and there are all-alpha, all-beta, alpha/beta and alpha+beta proteins. However, there is much difference in statistical property for those classes of proteins. In this paper, we will discuss protein structure in the view of the relative number of long-range (short-range) contacts for each residue. We find the percentage of residues having a large number of long-range contacts in protein is small in all-alpha class of proteins, and large in all-beta class of proteins. However, the percentage of residues is almost the same in alpha/beta and alpha+beta classes of proteins. We calculate the percentage of residues having the number of long-range contacts greater than or equal to (>/=) N(L)=5, and 7 for 428 proteins. The average percentage is 13.3%, 54.8%, 41.4% and 37.0% for all-alpha, all-beta, alpha/beta and alpha+beta classes of proteins with N(L)=5, respectively. With N(L) increasing, the percentage decreases, especially for all-alpha class of proteins. In the meantime, the percentage of residues having the number of short-range contacts greater than or equal to N(S) (>/=N(S)) in protein samples is large for all-alpha class of proteins, and small for all-beta class of proteins, especially for large N(S). We also investigate the ability of amino residues in forming a large number of long-range and short-range contacts. Cys, Val, Ile, Tyr, Trp and Phe can form a large number of long-range contacts easily, and Glu, Lys, Asp, Gln, Arg and Asn can form a large number of long-range contacts, but with difficulty. We also discuss the relative ability in forming short-range contacts for 20 amino residues. Comparison with Fauchere-Pliska hydrophobicity scale and the percentage of residues having large number of long-range contacts is also made. This investigation can provide some insights into the protein structure.

Multiple Dimensional Space for Protein Interface Residue Characterization

Five Dimensional Feature Space for Protein Binding Site Residue Prediction

Predicting protein structure from long-range contacts.

Inferring Protein-Protein Interface from Geometry of Unbound Structures

Study of protein interaction based on the triplets combination pairs of the residue groups

A New Probability Method to Understand Protein-Protein Interface Formation Mechanism at Amino Acid Level

Protein Interface Conservation Across Structure Space

Identifying protein-protein interface via a novel multi-scale local sequence and structural representation

Protein 3d Features and Surface Modeling Research

Integrating co-evolutionary signals and other properties of residue pairs to distinguish biological interfaces from crystal contacts.

Geometric and Amino Acid Type Determinants for Protein-Protein Interaction Interfaces

Protein-protein Interface Prediction Based on Hexagon Structure Similarity

Encoding the Space of Protein-protein Binding Interfaces by Artificial Intelligence

New Method to Analyze Protein-Protein Interaction Interface

Protein-Protein Interaction Interface Residue Pair Prediction Based on Deep Learning Architecture

Structural Characterisation and Prediction of Protein-protein Interfaces

Identifying Protein-Protein Interfacial Residues In Heterocomplexes Using Residue Conservation Scores

Protein Space: A Natural Method for Realizing the Nature of Protein Universe

Accurate prediction of interfacial residues in two-domain proteins using evolutionary information: implications for three-dimensional modeling

An Analysis of Protein Conservation Residues Network

Structure-based Method for Analyzing Protein-Protein Interfaces.