A Remedy for the Pars Pro Toto Fallacy in Chinese Semiotics

Hongbing Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2016-0030
2016-01-01
Chinese Semiotic Studies
Abstract:Abstract This article reviews one of John Deely’s insightful works on semiotics, Basics of Semiotics, and its profound significance for present-day Chinese semiotics. Considering critical responses from the readership of all previous editions of Basics, this article argues that Deely’s Basics has probably stood as the only successful book that traces the subject matter of semiotics not only in human cultures, but also in animal and plant kingdoms to the full extent of biosemiosis, and even to the state before the existence of life. This anti-anthropocentric treatise is of particular import to much-vaunted contemporary Chinese semiotics, which is rife with what is known as the pars pro toto fallacy, something that could have been avoided had Yuen-Ren Chao’s words of about 50 years ago been duly heeded, something for which Deely’s Basics may well serve as a fine remedy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?