De 21Ste-Eeuwse Overheidsmanager

Zeger van der Wal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/bk/092733872016025003010

2016-01-01

Bestuurskunde

Abstract:in een serie artikelen nader op in.Wij hopen dat hierdoor een brede discussie van de grond zal komen over staat en toekomst van de bestuurskunde en nodigen onze lezers van harte uit daaraan mee te doen.U kunt reageren op de Facebook-pagina van de VB, facebook.com/bestuurskunde.nl.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Returning to Our Roots: “good Government” Evolves to “good Governance”

James L. Perry,Gjalt de Graaf,Zeger van der Wal,Cor van Montfort

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12164

IF: 8.144

2014-01-01

Public Administration Review

Abstract:Public Administration ReviewVolume 74, Issue 1 p. 27-28 ARTICLE Returning to Our Roots: "Good Government" Evolves to "Good Governance" James L. Perry, James L. Perry Indiana University BloomingtonSearch for more papers by this authorGjalt de Graaf, Gjalt de Graaf VU University AmsterdamSearch for more papers by this authorZeger van der Wal, Zeger van der Wal National University of SingaporeSearch for more papers by this authorCor van Montfort, Cor van Montfort Tilburg University and Court of AuditSearch for more papers by this author James L. Perry, James L. Perry Indiana University BloomingtonSearch for more papers by this authorGjalt de Graaf, Gjalt de Graaf VU University AmsterdamSearch for more papers by this authorZeger van der Wal, Zeger van der Wal National University of SingaporeSearch for more papers by this authorCor van Montfort, Cor van Montfort Tilburg University and Court of AuditSearch for more papers by this author First published: 13 January 2014 https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12164Citations: 25Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References Bevir, Mark. 2009. Key Concepts in Governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Brinkerhoff, Derick W., and Arthur A. Goldsmith. 2005. Institutional Dualism and International Devlopment. A Revisionist Interpretation of Good Governance. Administration & Society 37(2): 199–224. Choudry, Aziz. 2002. The Asian Development Bank—"Governing" the Pacific?.ZSpace, June 11. http://www.zcommunications.org/the-asian-development-bank-governing-the-pacific-by-aziz-choudry.html [accessed November 25, 2013]. De Graaf, Gjalt. 2013. Discourse and Tractable Morality. In Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics, edited by Christoph Lütge, 581–602. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Grindle, Merilee S. 2010. Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea. Working Paper no. 202, Harvard University, Center for International Development. http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4448993 [accessed November 25, 2013]. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2007. The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Answering the Critics. Policy Research Working Paper no. 4149, World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-4149 [accessed November 25, 2013]. Kettl, Donald F. 1993. Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. LeGrand, Julian. 2007. The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rhodes, R. A. W. 2007. Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies 28(8): 1243–64. Rothstein, Bo, and Jan Teorell. 2012. Defining and Measuring Quality of Government. In Good Government: The Relevance of Political Science, edited by Sören Holmberg and Bo Rothstein, 13–39. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Citing Literature Volume74, Issue1January/February 2014Pages 27-28 ReferencesRelatedInformation
The Bureaucrat, the Businessperson, and Their Perceptions of Each Other's Value Orientation: Empirical Notions on the Other Sector's Most Important Organizational Values

Zeger van der Wal,Gjalt de Graaf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/pin1099-9922090103

2007-01-01

Public Integrity

Abstract:How do business and government managers perceive each other's value orientations? The debate on ethics in the public and private sectors has largely neglected this question. A survey of 231 top-level government officials and 151 business executives in the Netherlands found remarkable differences between the moral self-images of public and private sector managers and their perceptions of each other. An important practical implication is that managers in each sector should be aware of the ways their ethical self-images differ from those of their counterparts in the other arena.
Werknemers En Het Technologisch Vernieuwingsbeleid (employees and Technological Innovation Policies)

Loet Leydesdorff

1984-01-01

Abstract:Dutch Abstract: Naarmate de industriele produktie kennisintensiever wordt, worden ook de vakbonden voor een nieuwe uitdaging gesteld: hoe kan de visie van werknemers op de technologische ontwikkeling beter tot zijn recht komen? In de huidige situatie zijn werknemers en hun organisaties niet vanzelfsprekend in staat een positieve bijdrage te leveren aan het vernieuwingsproces. Aanzetten daartoe zijn echter wel degelijk aanwezig. Daarbij is ook het wetenschappelijk onderzoek betrokken, bijvoorbeeld via de Wetenschapswinkel en via studieonderdelen Wetenschap en Samenleving. Welke mogelijkheden hebben natuurwetenschappers en technologen om in te gaan op vragen van maatschappelijke organisaties? Hoe kunnen zij de ontwikkeling van de wetenschap vanuit pat perspectief beinvloeden? Aan welke voorwaarden moet dan door maatschappelijke organisaties (en door de overheid) worden voldaan? De auteur is zowel theoretisch als praktisch bij deze vragen betrokken (hij was een van de oprichters van de Wetenschapswinkel). In deze studie brengt hij een aantal gezichtspunten over de maatschappelijke beheersing van technologische ontwikkelingen in verband met de discussie over medezeggenschap in de industrie. Daaruit resulteert een uitgewerkt politiek perspectief: een maatschappelijk georienteerde markteconomie bij een kennisintensieve produktiewijze. English Abstract: Using the model of the Science Shop of the University of Amsterdam, this book reports on a series of studies (during the years 1978-1982) about technological innovation and the position and rights of employees at the AKZO plant of fine chemicals in the Amsterdam harbor. The author served in these years with coauthors as advisors of the Enterprise Council and the Industrial League of the Netherlands Trade-Union (IB-FNV). In the Netherlands, Investment decisions and reorganizations have to be discussed in the Enterprise Councils. The Science Shop implies that specific (e.g., juridical or chemical) expertise available at the University of Amsterdam was called upon when needed. In addition to this operational counter-expertise, the strategic planning cycle and portfolio management of AKZO Chemistry Ltd. were evaluated from the perspective of strengthening the external democratization of science, technology, and innovation policies, both at the level of the local enterprise and (inter)nationally.
Being a Public Manager in Times of Crisis: the Art of Managing Stakeholders, Political Masters, and Collaborative Networks

Zeger Van Der Wal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13245

IF: 8.144

2020-01-01

Public Administration Review

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic is seen as the biggest crisis since World War II. What started out as a public health issue has quickly morphed into a political, economic, and societal crisis of epic proportions. Administrative capacity is a major factor in determining whether societies will emerge from this unprecedented situation with resilience and optimism or despair and disconnectedness, and whether trust in government will increase or decrease. Autonomous and competent public managers are key producers of such administrative capacity. This essay addresses those public managers, the unsung administrative heroes leading us through times of crisis from behind the scenes. Translating the state of the art in public administration literature, with a particular emphasis on publications in this journal, into accessible practitioner recommendations, it identifies three key competencies paramount to public managers in times of crisis: managing stakeholders, political masters, and collaborative networks.
Communication in the heart of policy and the conduct of conduct: Government communication in the Netherlands

Niels Kraaier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-01-2015-0009

2016-02-02

Abstract:Purpose – In 2001, Dutch politician Jacques Wallage introduced the concept of “communication in the heart of policy”, which sought to bridge the perceived gap between the government and the populace. He also advocated for a stronger focus on the proper representation of cabinet ministers in the mass media. The purpose of this paper is to explore the implications experienced by communication professionals in the Dutch public service in terms of integrating this approach. Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on a series of 17 qualitative semi-structured interviews held with communication professionals either previously or currently employed in the Dutch public service. Findings – The findings show that it has become increasingly difficult for communication professionals in the Dutch public service to maintain the strict separation between government communication and political communication that once characterised their work. Research limitations/implications – The focus of this paper is on government communication in the Netherlands at a national level. Practical implications – This paper argues that a stronger focus on the image and reputation of cabinet members blurs the line between government communication and political communication, which may defeat the purpose of “communication in the heart of policy”. Originality/value – This paper offers a unique insight into government communication practices in a consociational state, where politics are marked by negotiation and a common striving for broad consensus, and where the public service is controlled by coalition governments rather than one particular party.

Sociology,Political Science
Public Value Privatized? the Need for a Continuous Emphasis on How to Actualize the Public Interest

Zeger Van Der Wal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01961.x

IF: 8.144

2008-01-01

Public Administration Review

Abstract:Public Administration ReviewVolume 69, Issue 1 p. 166-167 Public Value Privatized? The Need for a Continuous Emphasis on How to Actualize the Public Interest Zeger Van Der Wal, Corresponding Author Zeger Van Der Wal VU University AmsterdamZeger van der Wal is an assistant professor in public administration at the VU University Amsterdam Research Group on the Integrity of Governance. His research interests include public and private sector values, administrative ethics, business ethics, public service motivation, and private sector management.E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Zeger Van Der Wal, Corresponding Author Zeger Van Der Wal VU University AmsterdamZeger van der Wal is an assistant professor in public administration at the VU University Amsterdam Research Group on the Integrity of Governance. His research interests include public and private sector values, administrative ethics, business ethics, public service motivation, and private sector management.E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 21 December 2008 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01961.xCitations: 1Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume69, Issue1January | February 2009Pages 166-167 RelatedInformation
De Opmerkelijke Terugkeer Van De Kosten-Batenanalyse in Het Centrum Van De Bestuurspraktijk

Martin de Jong,Harry Geerlings

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1347/benm.30.3.166.16440

2003-01-01

Abstract:textabstractDecision-making on transport infrastucture projects in the Netherlands has been facing a remarkable wind of change in recent years. After a period of about a decade in the 1990s in which both academics and practitiones in policy analysis, public policy and planning have claimed that the traditional policy analysis methods were obsolete (be they CBA or MCA) because of their assumed one sidedness and lack of adaptability to the requirements of multi-actor settings, they experience a sudden resurgence since the year 2000 in the form of OEEI (Overview of Economic Effects of Infrastructure), a refined application of the wellknown CBA method. Astonishingly and despite all political and administrative theory on the types of information policy actors can process, the need for transparancy and active actor involvement in the evaluation and decision process, all at odds with traditional policy analysis, OEEI has become highly successful. This paper delves into the issue of why this new version of Cost Benefit Analysis has become so politically successful despite predictions made to the contrary. In addition, it will focus on the question if this resurgence may lead to 'econocracy' (concpetual hegemony by economists and thier ideologies and methods over other approaches) or not, and if so, how can this be prevented.
Navigating conflicting expectations in addressing healthcare scarcity: a q-methodology study on the Dutch National Health Care Institute

Jolien van de Sande,Bert de Graaff,Diana Delnoij,Antoinette de Bont

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133124000136

2024-10-11

Health Economics Policy and Law

Abstract:In many European countries, semi-autonomous agencies have been created in health policy to safeguard general public interests. In executing their tasks, these agencies need to deal with conflicting expectations. Particularly avoiding the risk of regulatory capture and aligning with parent ministries are frequently studied challenges, even more so when complex issues such as scarcity are at stake. In this paper, we use q-methodology to provide a thorough overview of the debate regarding the role of an important agency in the Dutch healthcare system; the National Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland). We conducted 41 q-interviews with agency employees, evaluators, regulatees, ministry employees, health policy experts, members of its advisory committees, and peer agencies. We identify three viewpoints on what the agency should focus on. These are on societally relevant issues, strict package management, and efficient organisation of care. In doing so, our study shows how agencies are pulled in different directions by conflicting expectations. We show that this can be problematic because it complicates a clear role of the agency that allows addressing such issues. We thereby contribute to theories on agencies' complex relations with their external environment such as regulatory capture, tripartism, reflexive regulation, legal boundaries, and stewardship theory.

health policy & services
Competing Values in Public Administration

Zeger van der Wal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1368

2020-01-01

Abstract:Public administration theory and practice are been rife with competing values, and 21st-century trends and challenges create new value dilemmas. Values—standards and qualities that guide behavior and decision making—can compete for attention because they may be of equal importance to the larger public interest that administrative actors are aiming to realize yet adhering to each of them at once is not feasible or possible. Examples are transparency, accountability, equity, effectiveness, efficiency, and legality. Hence, administrative actors have to find ways to manage competing values at an individual and institutional level.
Competing Values in Public Management

Zeger van der Wal,Gjalt de Graaf,Alan Lawton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.554098

IF: 6.004

2011-01-01

Public Management Review

Abstract:The main objective of the article is to review relevant literature on (competing) public values in public management and to present a number of perspectives on how to deal with value conflicts in different administrative settings and contexts. We start this symposium with the assumption that value conflicts are prevalent, the public context can be characterized by value pluralism, and instrumental rationality does not seem to be the most useful to understand or improve value conflicts in public governance. This begs the question: what is the best way to study and manage value conflicts? The contributions to this symposium issue approach value conflicts in public governance from different perspectives, within different countries and different administrative and management systems, hoping to contribute to the debate on how to deal with important yet conflicting public values in public management, without pretending to offer a conclusive strategy or approach.This introductory article also presents and reviews the contributions to this symposium issue. Keywords: Public valuescompeting valuespublic managementgood governanceethics Acknowledgements We thank Stephen Osborne for the opportunity to guest-edit this Symposium of Public Management Review, and are grateful to all the individuals who agreed to act as reviewers. Also, we thank Hester L. Paanakker and Anneke Twijnstra for their assistance in making the conference possible.
Value Solidity in Government and Business: Results of an Empirical Study on Public and Private Sector Organizational Values

z van der wal,l w j c huberts,vu,faculteit der sociale wetenschappen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074007309154

2008-01-01

Abstract:This article reports on a survey study of 382 managers from a variety of public and private sector organizations, on the values that guide sectoral decision making. Just as some important classical differences emerge, a number of similarities between the public and private sector appear to result in a set of common core organizational values. Furthermore, the data support neither increasing adoption of business values in public sector organizations nor flirtation with public values by business sector managers. This contradicts expectations in the literature on new public management and corporate social responsibility, suggesting public-private value intermixing. Value solidity seems the dominant feature in both sectors. Additional analysis shows that "publicness," the extent to which an organization belongs to the public or the private sector rather than age, gender, years of service or a past in the other sector-strongly determines value preferences.
Public Managers, Media Influence, and Governance

Erik Hans Klijn,Mark van Twist,Martijn van der Steen,Stephen Jeffares

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714527752

2016-07-27

Abstract:Nowadays, media and media logic have become important and inherent elements in everyday practices of public administration and policy making. However, the logic of the media is often very different from, and conflicting with, the logic of political and administrative life. So the question of how public managers experience and deal with media attention is more relevant than ever. An analytical sketch of the literature on the relationship between public managers and media provides three main categories of literature (public relations, agenda, and mediatization tradition). These three categories are used to develop statements (so-called Q-sort statements) to capture the way public managers experience their relationship with the media. A group of managers involved in oversight then sorted these statements into order of preference. The research reveals three different groups of managers who show different attitudes to media attention and whom we have labeled as adaptors, great communicators, and fatalists.

public administration
Harmony In Hierarchy? How Politicians And Public Managers Prioritize Crucial Public Values

Zeger Van Der Wal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020140000003010

2014-01-01

Abstract:Purpose - This qualitative interview study compares public value prioritizations of ministers, members of parliament and senior public managers in the Netherlands. This article aims to answer the following central research question: how do Dutch political elites and administrative elites differ in their interpretation and prioritization of public values?Design/methodology/approach - Based on coding and categorization of 65 interviews this article shows how government elites in advanced western democracies interpret and assess four crucial public values: responsiveness, expertise, lawfulness and transparency.Findings - Political elites and administrative elites in the Netherlands are more similar than different in their prioritization and perceptions of public values. Differences are strongly related to role conceptions and institutional responsibilities, which are more traditional than most recent literature on politico-administrative dynamics would suggest.Research limitations/implications - Our qualitative findings are hard to generalize to larger populations of politicians and public managers in the Netherlands, let alone beyond the Netherlands. However, the testable research hypotheses we derive from our explorative study merit future testing among larger populations of respondents in different countries through survey research.Practical implications - Experienced values differences between both groups are smaller than their mutual perceptions would suggest.Originality/value - Most research on public values is quantitative in nature and focuses exclusively on public managers. By adding the politician to the equation we improve our understanding of how public values are enacted in real life and set the tone for a more inclusive research agenda on public values.
The Cultural Dimension of Metagovernance: Why Governance Doctrines May Fail

Louis Meuleman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-009-0088-5

2009-08-13

Public Organization Review

Abstract:National cultures often reflect a preference for one of the ideal-types hierarchical, network or market governance. A comparison of four similar policy cases in the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and the European Commission reveals that successful public managers under certain conditions are able to construct and design productive mixtures of the three styles. They applied metagovernance, a process of designing and managing situationally optimal combinations of the three competing, and to an extent mutually undermining, governance styles. Their national cultures and politico-administrative traditions co-determined the governance mixture which would work in a given situation. The research reinforces the case already made by others, that governance doctrines cannot be transferred as ‘best practices’ from one nation to another without adaptation. The article suggests that the future does not lie in inventing new management and governance doctrines, but in investing in post-dogmatic public management.
Philips En De Wetenschap (philips and Science)

Loet Leydesdorff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3391918

1980-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Dutch Abstract: Vaak wordt gesteld, dat grote ondernemingen een overheersende invloed hebben op de wetenschap. In het nieuwe universitaire vakgebied Wetenschap en Samenleving wordt deze invloed onderzocht. Met dit boek publiceert de SUA de resultaten van één van de eerste afgeronde studies op dit gebied.Het gaat over ‘natuurkunde’ en Philips.In het eerste deel wordt beschreven, hoe Philips vanaf de oprichting van het eigen Natuurkundig Laboratorium in 1914 de leiding heeft genomen in de ontwikkeling van de zogenaamde vaste-stof fysica in Nederland. Hoe de universitaire en industriële fysicabeoefening verweven zijn geraakt, wordt met een zogenaamd dubbelfunktieonderzoek onder researchmanagers geïllustreerd.In het tweede deel komen deze onderzoekers zelf uitvoerig aan het woord. Over uiteenlopende onderwerpen zoals wetenschapsbeleid, methodologie, maatschappelijke verantwoordelijkheid en maatschappelijke relevantie werden Philipsmedewerkers en universitaire natuurkundigen geïnterviewd. De opmerkelijke verschillen tussen deze twee groepen worden behandeld in hun sociale kontekst. Maakt het uit voor welke baas je werkt? Ook de opleiding tot natuurkundige en de vermaatschappelijking daarvan komen aan de orde.Behalve een veelheid aan empirisch materiaal en citaten bevat het boek ook een theoretische inleiding en de relaties tussen kennisproduktie en warenproduktie, tussen hoofd- en handenarbeid, tussen het wetenschapsbedrijf en het grootste fabriekssysteem in Nederland, Philips. In een nabeschouwing benadrukken de schrijvers het belang van samenwerking met de vakbeweging bij dit soort onderzoek.English Abstract: This book is the outcome of a "Science and Society" project by staff and students at the University of Amsterdam (Department of Philosophy) during the study year 1976-’77 about the role of Philips in the intellectual and social organization of solid-state physics in the Netherlands. The first part describes how Philips, from the establishment of its own Physics Laboratory in 1914, has taken the lead in the development of solid state physics in the Netherlands. How the university and industrial physics practice have become entwined is illustrated with a so-called double-function study among university professors and research managers.Philips employees and university physicists working in approximately the same domain were interviewed on a variety of topics such as science policy, methodology, social responsibility and social relevance. The significant differences are explained in terms of the different social context. Also the training to become a physicist and the socialization thereof are discussed.In addition to a multitude of empirical materials and quotes, the book also contains a theoretical introduction into the relationships between knowledge production and industrial production, between main and manual labor, between the knowledge-based company and the largest factory system in the Netherlands, Philips. The authors signal that trade-unions hardly play a role in the knowledge dynamics of the political economy.
Elite Ethics: Comparing Public Values Prioritization Between Administrative Elites and Political Elites

Zeger Van der Wal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.928319

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In this article, we compare how administrative and political elites in The Netherlands, the European Union, and the United States perceive and prioritize four key public values—responsiveness, expertise, lawfulness, and transparency. Our data from 94 in-depth interviews show that political elites and administrative elites differ most in their perception and prioritization of expertise and transparency and less in responsiveness and lawfulness. Interestingly, these politico-administrative value differences largely hold across the institutional settings we study. Theorizing on our results, we formulate eight propositions for future studies. Our study contributes to public values research by using qualitative methodology and including politicians.
Abstracties en idealisaties: de constructie van de moderne taalkunde

Martin Stokhof,M. van Lambalgen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/tvf.72.4.2062399

2010-01-01

Tijdschrift voor Filosofie

Abstract:Abstracties en Idealisatie:De Constructie van de Moderne Taalkunde Martin StokhofMichiel van Lambalgen22 december 20091 Inleiding De moderne taalkunde is in bepaalde opzichten een van de opmerkelijkste en succes-volste wetenschappelijke vernieuwingen van de twintigste eeuw. De opkomst van degeneratieve grammatica in de jaren vijftig en zestig zorgde voor een sfeer van intellec-tueel enthousiasme die voorbehouden leek aan fundamentele ontwikkelingen binnende natuurwetenschappen. En het enthousiasme bleef niet beperkt tot de taalkunde zelf,maar strekte zich uit tot andere gebieden, zoals de ﬁlosoﬁe, de in opkomst zijnde in-formatica en cognitieve psychologie, de antropologie, de letterkunde. En tot op de dagvan vandaag geldt de moderne taalkunde als model van wetenschappelijke vernieuwingvoor vele andere geesteswetenschappelijke disciplines.Een werkelijke verklaring van deze opmerkelijke ontwikkeling zal een aantalfactoren in ogenschouw moeten nemen. De rol die de natuurwetenschappen en de for-mele wetenschappen als ‘standaardmodel’ van wetenschappelijkheid spelen is daar eenvan. Een andere factor heeft te maken met de wijze waarop de moderne taalkunde aanlijkt te sluiten bij discipline-interne ontwikkelingen in andere vakgebieden. Sociologi-sche factoren, zoals de interne organisatie van de discipline, spelen ook een rol.
Managing Conflicting Public Values: Governing with Integrity and Effectiveness

Gjalt de Graaf,Zeger van der Wal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010375298

2010-01-01

Abstract:The articles of this symposium were all part of the First Global Dialogue on Ethical and Effective Governance, a conference organized by the VU University in Amsterdam in May 2009. In this introduction we focus on the subtitle of the conference: governing with integrity and governing effectively/efficiently - both are intrinsically valued. The importance of governing with moral public values like transparency, equity, and honesty is clear. Yet it is also clear that acting on moral values does not always produce the required policy outcomes. The potential conflict between governing with integrity and governing efficiently and effectively is the central theme of this symposium.
Marketing : de essentie

Ton Borchert,Philip Kotler,Paul van Hoek,Gary Armstrong

Abstract:Het betreft hier de Nederlandse bewerking van het boek Marketing: an introduction van Philip Kotler en Gary Armstrong. Topmarketeers hebben allemaal dezelfde missie: de klant centraal stellen in de marketing. Hedendaagse marketing draait volledig om het creeren van klantwaarde en het opbouwen van winstgevende klantrelaties. Meer dan andere marketingboeken biedt 'Marketing, de essentie' dit geintegreerde kader van klantwaarde en klantrelaties op een heldere en bondige manier. In deze herziene en geactualiseerde editie van 'Marketing, de essentie' wordt nog meer aandacht besteed aan de marketing van diensten en aan nieuwe marketinginstrumenten zoals social media. Actuele en aansprekende praktijkvoorbeelden uit Nederland en Vlaanderen verduidelijken de theorie. Marketing, de essentie is geschikt als inleiding tot de marketing voor studenten in het hoger commercieel onderwijs. Het is daarnaast ook bedoeld voor opleidingen waarin commercie geen hoofdrol speelt, maar waar de student wel wordt geacht inzicht te hebben in dit onderwerp.
A technical investigation on tools and concepts for sustainable management of the subsurface in The Netherlands

Jasper Griffioen,Joke van Wensem,Justine L M Oomes,Frans Barends,Jaap Breunese,Hans Bruining,Theo Olsthoorn,Alfons J M Stams,Almer E C van der Stoel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.114

2014-07-01

Abstract:In response to increasing use of the subsurface, there is a need to modernise policies on sustainable use of the subsurface. This holds in particular for the densely populated Netherlands. We aimed to analyse current practice of subsurface management and the associated pressure points and to establish a conceptual overview of the technical issues related to sustainable management of the subsurface. Case studies on the exploitation of subsurface resources (including spatial use of the subsurface) were analysed, examining social relevance, environmental impact, pressure points and management solutions. The case studies ranged from constructing underground garages to geothermal exploitation. The following issues were identified for the technological/scientific aspects: site investigation, suitability, risk assessment, monitoring and measures in the event of failure. Additionally, the following general issues were identified for the administrative aspects: spatial planning, option assessment, precaution, transparency, responsibility and liability. These issues were explored on their technological implications within the framework of sustainable management of the subsurface. This resulted into the following key aspects: (1) sustainability assessment, (2) dealing with uncertainty and (3) policy instruments and governance. For all three aspects, different options were identified which might have a legal, economic or ethical background. The technological implications of these backgrounds have been identified. A set of recommendations for sustainable management of the subsurface resources (incl. space) was established: (1) management should be driven by scarcity, (2) always implement closed loop monitoring when the subsurface activities are high-risk, (3) when dealing with unknown features and heterogeneity, apply the precautionary principle, (4) responsibility and liability for damage must be set out in legislation and (5) sustainability should be incorporated in all relevant legislation and not only in environmental legislation. Other aspects to be considered are the reversibility of the impacts from subsurface activities and the abandonment of installations.

De 21Ste-Eeuwse Overheidsmanager

Returning to Our Roots: “good Government” Evolves to “good Governance”

The Bureaucrat, the Businessperson, and Their Perceptions of Each Other's Value Orientation: Empirical Notions on the Other Sector's Most Important Organizational Values

Werknemers En Het Technologisch Vernieuwingsbeleid (employees and Technological Innovation Policies)

Being a Public Manager in Times of Crisis: the Art of Managing Stakeholders, Political Masters, and Collaborative Networks

Communication in the heart of policy and the conduct of conduct: Government communication in the Netherlands

Public Value Privatized? the Need for a Continuous Emphasis on How to Actualize the Public Interest

De Opmerkelijke Terugkeer Van De Kosten-Batenanalyse in Het Centrum Van De Bestuurspraktijk

Navigating conflicting expectations in addressing healthcare scarcity: a q-methodology study on the Dutch National Health Care Institute

Competing Values in Public Administration

Competing Values in Public Management

Value Solidity in Government and Business: Results of an Empirical Study on Public and Private Sector Organizational Values

Public Managers, Media Influence, and Governance

Harmony In Hierarchy? How Politicians And Public Managers Prioritize Crucial Public Values

The Cultural Dimension of Metagovernance: Why Governance Doctrines May Fail

Philips En De Wetenschap (philips and Science)

Elite Ethics: Comparing Public Values Prioritization Between Administrative Elites and Political Elites

Abstracties en idealisaties: de constructie van de moderne taalkunde

Managing Conflicting Public Values: Governing with Integrity and Effectiveness

Marketing : de essentie

A technical investigation on tools and concepts for sustainable management of the subsurface in The Netherlands