Abstract:Previous articleNext article No AccessCommunicationsThe Possibility of a Paretian Liberal: Impossibility Theorems and Cardinal UtilityY. K. NgY. K. Ng Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 79, Number 6Nov. - Dec., 1971 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/259845 Views: 10Total views on this site Citations: 29Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1971 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ahmet KARA A GENERALIZATION OF THE PARETIAN LIBERAL PARADOX, Öneri Dergisi (Feb 2020).https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.691206Ahmet KARA A UTILITARIAN RESOLUTION OF THE PARETIAN LİBERAL PARADOX, Öneri Dergisi (Jan 2020): 101–103.https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.685716Amartya Sen Social Choice, (Feb 2018): 12481–12499.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1856Saleem Hassan Ali The Challenging Shift to a Circular Economy: The Relevance of Social Ecology in Effective Transition, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2817867Hanno Beck Ist paretianischer Liberalismus doch möglich? Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Ökonomik und Liberaler Paternalismus, List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik 36, no.11 (Aug 2016): 43–58.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373322Amartya Sen Social Choice, (Mar 2017): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1856-2Herrade Igersheim Le paradoxe libéral-parétien: un second théorème d'impossibilité dû aux “effets d'indépendance”, Social Science Information 45, no.44 (Jun 2016): 501–537.https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069588Geremia Palomba Moral Principles and Individual Rights: How to Use Ethical Imperatives to Solve the Gibbard's Libertarian Paradox, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.412242Louis Kaplow A Fundamental Objection to Tax Equity Norms: A Call for Utilitarianism, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1997).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.42587LOUIS KAPLOW A FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTION TO TAX EQUITY NORMS: A CALL FOR UTILITARIANISM, National Tax Journal 48, no.44 (Mar 2021): 497–514.https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789167Robert P. Berrens, Stephen Polasky The Paretian Liberal Paradox and ecological economics, Ecological Economics 14, no.11 (Jul 1995): 45–56.https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(95)00010-7Michael Williams, Geert Reuten The political economy of welfare and economic policy, European Journal of Political Economy 10, no.22 (Jul 1994): 253–278.https://doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(94)90019-1Y. Xu The Libertarian paradox: some further observations, Social Choice and Welfare 7, no.44 (Dec 1990): 343–351.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01376282Amartya Sen Social Choice, (Nov 2016): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1856-1Amartya Sen Chapter 22 Social choice theory, (Jan 1986): 1073–1181.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4382(86)03004-7Yew-Kwang Ng Beyond pareto optimality: The necessity of interpersonal cardinal utilities in distributional judgements and social choice, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 42, no.33 (Sep 1982): 207–233.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01282907Richard D. Auster, Morris Silver The State as a Service Firm, The Production of Order, (Jan 1979): 5–14.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7627-9_2Richard D. Auster, Morris Silver Theories of the Emergence of States, (Jan 1979): 15–26.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7627-9_3Richard D. Auster, Morris Silver The Sizes of States, (Jan 1979): 27–42.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7627-9_4Richard D. Auster, Morris Silver The Qualities of State Activity, (Jan 1979): 43–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7627-9_5Richard D. Auster, Morris Silver The Monopoly State, (Jan 1979): 55–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7627-9_6Richard D. Auster, Morris Silver Democracy, the Corporate State, (Jan 1979): 69–88.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7627-9_7Richard D. Auster, Morris Silver Democracy as a Consumer Good, (Jan 1979): 89–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7627-9_8Richard D. Auster, Morris Silver Experimental Remedies, (Jan 1979): 96–110.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7627-9_9 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES, (Jan 1978): 169–185.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-403350-4.50019-4Jerry S Kelly Rights exercising and a Pareto-consistent libertarian claim, Journal of Economic Theory 13, no.11 (Aug 1976): 138–153.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90071-5Melville McMillan Criteria for jurisdictional design, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3, no.11 (Jun 1976): 46–68.https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(76)90012-7Peter Bernholz Is a paretian liberal really impossible?, Public Choice 20, no.11 (Dec 1974): 99–107.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718180Richard Auster, Morris Silver Collective goods and collective decision mechanisms, Public Choice 14-14, no.11 (Mar 1973): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718439

The Paradox of Interpersonal Cardinal Utility: A Proposed Solution

Utilitarianism: Overcoming the Difficulty of Interpersonal Comparison

Utility and Happiness in a Prosperous Society

The Possibility of a Paretian Liberal: Impossibility Theorems and Cardinal Utility

Relative Net Utility and the Saint Petersburg Paradox

Interpersonal Comparison of Utility by Measuring Neural Activity

Efficiency, Equality, and Happiness: on the Ethical Foundation of Public Policy

Utility, Preference, and Happiness: Following Harsanyi's Argument to its Logical Conclusion

Utility, Informed Preference, or Happiness

Understanding the paradox between tragedies of the commons and the anticommons: From a cognitive psychology perspective

The paradox of effective altruism

An Axiomatic Framework for Cost-Benefit Analysis

Utility, Informed Preference, or Happiness: Following Harsanyi's Argument to Its Logical Conclusion

NON-ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, INDIRECT EXTERNALITIES, AND THIRD-BEST POLICIES

From preference to happiness: Towards a more complete welfare economics

Individualized Decision-Making Under Partial Identification: Three Perspectives, Two Optimality Results, and One Paradox

Hurka's Gamble and Methuselah's Paradox: a Response to Cowen on Normative Population Theory

Towards a Welfarist Cost-Benefit Analysis

Homo economicus to model human behavior is ethically doubtful and mathematically inconsistent

Some Reflections on Utility

Happiness Studies and the Problem of Interpersonal Comparisons of Satisfaction: Two Histories, Three Approaches