Abstract:The leader–member exchange (LMX) literature argues that leaders develop different quality dyadic relationships with members in the same team (i.e., LMX differentiation). Research has generally not found support for a linear (i.e., main effect) relationship between LMX differentiation and team performance; rather, moderators typically determine whether the relationship is significantly positive or negative. Examining linear effect moderators alone, however, does not account for (a) potential curvilinear (i.e., inverted U‐shaped) effects, (b) explanatory mechanisms of how LMX differentiation influences team performance, or (c) moderators of curvilinear effects. Integrating social identity theory with LMX differentiation research, we propose inverted U‐shaped relationships between LMX differentiation and both team coordination (as a mediator) and team performance (as an outcome), and we examine both team size and team power distance orientation as moderators. Using data from 928 employees in 145 teams in 3 organizations, we found an inverted U‐shaped relationship between LMX differentiation and team coordination, which, in turn, partially mediated LMX differentiation's inverted U‐shaped relationship with team performance. Larger teams, or those with higher team power distance orientation, benefit more from LMX differentiation. By integrating social identity theory with LMX differentiation research, we enhance the understanding of the processes by, and conditions under, which LMX differentiation affects team performance both positively and negatively.

Why Group Size Makes a Difference for Leader-Member Exchange?

Why Group Size Makes a Difference for Leader–member Exchange Quality

Leader-Member Exchange: A Theoretical Review and Practical Implications

Leader-member Exchange and Member Performance: A New Look at Individual-Level Negative Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Team-Level Empowerment Climate.

Effects of Perceptions on LMX and Work Performance: Effects of Supervisors’ Perception of Subordinates’ Emotional Intelligence and Subordinates’ Perception of Trust in the Supervisor on LMX And, Consequently, Performance

Leader-member Exchange and Employees’ Safety Behavior: the Moderating Effect of Safety Climate

Loyalty to Supervisor, Loyalty to Organization and Job Satisfaction: ——an Empirical Study on Small and Medium-Size Enterprises

The Paradox of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Differentiation

When leader–member exchange differentiation improves work group functioning: The combined roles of differentiation bases and reward interdependence

Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment.

Relative Leader-member Exchange and Unethical Pro-leader Behavior: A Cross-level Moderated Mediation

Relative Leader-Member Exchange and Unethical Pro-leader Behavior: the Role of Envy and Distributive Justice Climate

What is Wrong with Treating Followers Differently? the Basis of Leader-Member Exchange Differentiation Matters

Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange Differentiation: A Cross-Level Model

The Paradox Of Leader-Member Exchange (Lmx) Differentiation How Treating Followers Differently Can Both Enhance And Impede Employee Performance

Understanding the Curvilinear Relationships Between Lmx Differentiation and Team Coordination and Performance

The integrated effects of leader–member exchange social comparison on job performance and OCB in the Chinese context

Leader-member Exchange, Employee Performance, and Work Outcomes: an Empirical Study in the Chinese Context

Differentiation in leader-member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach

How Leader-Member Exchange Affects Knowledge Sharing Behavior: Understanding the Effects of Commitment and Employee Characteristics

Leader–member Exchange (LMX) in Context: How LMX Differentiation and LMX Relational Separation Attenuate LMX's Influence on OCB and Turnover Intention.