The divergent mechanisms of LGR receptors-1-Complex Structure of LGR 4 and Rspo 1 : Insights into the Divergent Mechanisms of Ligand Recognition by LGR Receptors
Jin-Gen Xu,Chunfeng Huang,Zhengfeng Yang,Mengmeng Jin,Panhan Fu,Ni Zhang,Jian Lou,Dali Li,Mingyao Liu,Yan Zhou,Yongqun Zhu
2014-01-01
Abstract:Leucine-rich repeat G-protein-coupled receptors (LGRs) are a unique class of GPCRs characterized by a large extracellular domain to recognize ligands and regulate many important developmental processes. Among the three groups of LGRs, group B members (LGR4-6) recognize R-spondin family proteins (Rspo1-4) to stimulate Wnt signaling. In this study, we successfully utilized the “hybrid LRR technique”, which fused LGR4 with the hagfish VLR protein, to obtain two recombinant human LGR4 proteins: LGR415 and LGR49. We determined the crystal structures of ligand-free LGR415 and the LGR49-Rspo1 complex. LGR4 exhibits a twisted horseshoe-like structure. Rspo1 adopts a flat and β-fold architecture, and is bound in the concave surface of LGR4 in the complex through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. All the Rspo1-binding residues are conserved in LGR4-6, suggesting that LGR4-6 bind R-spondins through an identical surface. Structural analysis of our LGR4-Rspo1 complex with the previously determined http://www.jbc.org/cgi/doi/10.1074/jbc.M114.599134 The latest version is at JBC Papers in Press. Published on December 5, 2014 as Manuscript M114.599134 Copyright 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. by gest on Jauary 4, 2015 hp://w w w .jb.org/ D ow nladed from The divergent mechanisms of LGR receptors -2LGR4 and LGR5 structures revealed that the concave surface of LGR4 is the sole binding site for R-spondins, suggesting a one-site binding model of LGR4-6 in ligand recognition. The molecular mechanism of LGR4-6 is distinct from the two-step mechanism of group A receptors LGR1-3 and the multiple-interface binding model of group C receptors LGR7-8, suggesting LGR receptors utilize the divergent mechanisms for ligand recognition. Our structures, together with previous reports, provide a comprehensive understanding of the ligand recognition by LGR receptors. INTRODUCTION G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a large group of cell surface receptors, play key roles in many cellular processes. GPCRs generally contain a seven-transmembrane (7TM) domain responsible for ligand binding and downstream G protein activation. Leucine-rich repeat G-protein-coupled receptors (LGRs) are a unique class of GPCRs characterized by a large extracellular domain (ectodomain) that harbors multiple copies of leucine-rich repeat (LRR) (1). The ectodomain mediates ligand binding to modulate downstream intracellular signaling pathways. LGRs are subdivided into three subgroups (group A, B and C), according to their sequence similarities (1,2). Group A LGRs have seven to nine LRRs in their ectodomain and long hinge regions connecting the LRR domain to the 7TM domain. Group A receptors includes LGR1, LGR2 and LGR3, which recognize follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), respectively (3,4). Group C LGRs have similar numbers of LRRs, but contain a low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain (LDLa) motif at the N-terminus and a short hinge region between the LRR domain and the 7TM domain. Group C LGRs includes the relaxin receptor LGR7 and INSL3 (insulin-like peptide 3) receptor LGR8 (1,3,4). The molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition by group A and C receptors have been extensively studied and are relatively well understood. The group B receptors include LGR4, LGR5 and LGR6, which are characterized by a long ectodomain containing 17 LRR repeats (2,4). LGR4-6 share approximately 50% sequence identity and play key roles in stem cell development. The 17 LRR repeats of the LGR4-6 receptors are flanked by the N-terminal cysteine-rich LRRNT region and the C-terminal cysteine-rich LRRCT region (4). The ligands of LGR4-6 remained unidentified for a long time. Recently, the secreted R-spondin proteins (Rspo1-4) were identified as the endogenous ligands for this group receptors to stimulate the Wnt signalling pathways, regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and adult stem cell maintenance (5,6). The R-spondin (Rspo) family of proteins include four members (Rspo1-4) and are conserved in vertebrates. R-spondins are involved in numerous developmental processes (7-9), including sex (10,11), lung, limb, hair follicle (9,12) and nail development (13-15). The four R-spondin proteins share approximately 40-60% pairwise sequence homology and adopt a common domain architecture that consists of an N-terminal secretory signal peptide sequence, two tandem furin-like cysteine-rich (Fu-CRD) domains, a thrombospodin type I repeat (TSP) domain and a C-terminal basic amino acid-rich (BR) domain. Among the four subdomains, the two central tandem Fu-CRD domains have by gest on Jauary 4, 2015 hp://w w w .jb.org/ D ow nladed from The divergent mechanisms of LGR receptors -3been demonstrated to be essential and sufficient for R-spondin stimulation of Wnt signaling (16-18). Previous studies had revealed that the ectodomains of LGR4-6 specifically recognize the two Fu-CRD domains of R-spondins (16,17). Although LGR4-6 contain a 7TM domain as the group A and group C receptors, the stimulation of Wnt signalling by LGR4-6 was found to be independent of downstream G protein activation, suggesting the functional difference of LGR4-6 from LGR1-3 and LGR7-8. Here we successfully utilized the “hybrid LRR technique” to obtain human LGR4 proteins from insect cells. We determined the crystal structure of human LGR4 alone at a resolution of 2.2 Å, as well as its complex structure with Rspo1 at a resolution of 2.25 Å. Our studies, together with the previously determined structures (19-22), suggest that LGR4-6 recognize R-spondins via a distinct mechanism from those of LGR1-3 and LGR7-8. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Plasmids, Reagents and Mutagenesis To express human LGR4 and Rspo1 in insect cells, the LGR415 and LGR49 hybrids (Fig. 1) were cloned into the pFastBac1 vector (Invitrogen) with a gp67 secretory signal peptide at the N-terminus and a Fc-9xHis tag with a TEV protease cleavage site at the C-terminus. The two furin-like cystein-rich regions of Rspo1 (residues 34-135) were cloned into the pFastBac1 vector with an N-terminal gp67 signal peptide. For TOP/FOPFlash assays, full length wild-type and mutant LGR4 were cloned into the pCDNA4 vector with a CD8 secretory signal peptide and a Flag tag at the N-terminus. Full length Rspo1 and its mutants were cloned into the pCDNA4 vector with a C-terminal HA tag. All site-directed mutagenesis were performed with the standard overlap-extension PCR method and all plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing. Protein Expression and Purification Recombinant proteins were expressed in Sf9 insect cells using the Bac-to-Bac baculovirus expression system (Invitrogen). LGR415 and LGR49 recombinant proteins were purified from cell medium using Ni-NTA resins. After TEV protease digestion to remove the C-terminal Fc-9xHis tag, the proteins were further purified by size exclusion chromatography using Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare). Both purified proteins were concentrated to 10 mg/ml in the Tris-HCl buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 150 mM NaCl for crystallization. To obtain the recombinant LGR4-Rspo1 complex, Sf9 cells were co-infected with baculoviruses encoding LGR49 and human Rspo1 (residues 34-135). After 60 hours post-infection, the LGR49-Rspo1 complex was purified from cell medium using Ni-NTA column, and further purified using MonoQ column (GE Healthcare). The purified LGR49-Rspo1 complex was concentrated to 40 mg/ml in the buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 150 mM NaCl for crystallization. Crystallization and Data Collection All crystallization experiments were carried out with the hanging-drop vapor diffusion method at 16 . °C In initial crystal screening, crystals of LGR415 and LGR49 appeared after 3 days. Crystals of LGR415 were selected for structural determination. After extensive optimization, diffraction-qualified crystals of LGR415 were obtained in the well condition containing 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5 and 2.0 M by gest on Jauary 4, 2015 hp://w w w .jb.org/ D ow nladed from The divergent mechanisms of LGR receptors -4ammonium sulfate. Crystals of LGR415 were transferred into the well solution supplemented with 15% glycerol as the cryoprotectant, and then flash-cooled into the liquid nitrogen for data collection. The LGR49-Rspo1 complex was crystallized after 7 days in the well solution containing 0.1 M MES pH 6.5, 0.2 M sodium thiocyanate and 22% PEG 3350. The crystals were cryoprotected with the well solution supplemented with 20% glycerol in liquid nitrogen. All diffraction data were collected on the BL17U1 beamline of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) and processed with the HKL-2000 package (23). Structural Determination The LGR415 structure was solved with the molecular replacement method using the partial model of LRR repeats from TLR5 (PDB ID: 3V44) (24) as the search mode in the Phaser program (25) in CCP4 (26). The final structure was refined to 2.2 Å with Rwork/Rfree of 20.7%/23.4% in Refmac5 (27). There is one LGR415 molecule in an asymmetric unit. The LGR49-Rspo1 complex structure was solved with the molecular replacement method using LGR415 and VLR (129-200) as the search modes. The final structure of LGR49-Rspo1 complex was refined to 2.25 Å with Rwork/Rfree of 21.3%/24.2% in Refmac5. There are two LGR49-Rspo1 complex molecules in an asymmetric unit. Due to the lack of electron density, the N-terminal 18 residues and C-terminal 5 residues of Rspo1 were missed in the final complex model. All model building was performed in Coot (28). All structures were checked with the program Procheck (29). All structural pictures were prepared in PyMol (http://www.delanoscientific.com/). Statistics of data collection and refinement are listed in Table 1. TOP/FOPFlash Assays TOP/FOPFlash assays were carried out similarly as described (30). To test the effect of Rspo1 mutations, HEK293T cells cultured in 12-wel