A Study on the Differences of Mechanical Properties between CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> Hydrate-Bearing Sediments

Yuan Luo,Yong Chen Song,Wei Guo Liu,Jia Fei Zhao,Yun Fei Chen,Zhi Tao Shen,Chong Ming Ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.353-356.1240
2013-01-01
Applied Mechanics and Materials
Abstract:The CH4-CO2replacement method to recover CH4from hydrate-bearing sediments has received great attention because it enables the long term storage of CO2and is expected to maintain the stability of gas hydrate-bearing sediments. This paper extends our previous study of the stability of CH4hydrate-bearing sediments to CO2hydrate-bearing sediments to evaluate the safety of the CH4-CO2replacement method. Low temperature, high pressure triaxial compression apparatus was used to measure the mechanical properties of CO2hydrate-bearing sediments. The triaxial tests results for CH4and CO2hydrate-bearing sediments were then compared. It was found that the failure mode of both the CO2and CH4hydrate-bearing sediments was a bulging deformation at mid-height on the samples. Moreover, the stress-strain curves of both the CO2and CH4hydrate-bearing sediments appear to be hyperbolic in shape, and could be divided into three stages: the quasi-elastic stage, the hardening stage and the yield stage. However, the strength of the CO2hydrate-bearing sediments was approximately 15% larger than that of the CH4hydrate-bearing sediments under the same conditions. The results imply that the stability of gas hydrate-bearing sediments could be maintained using the CH4-CO2replacement method to recover CH4from these sediments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?