Debating East Asian Capitalism: Issues and Themes
Andrew Walter,Xiaoke Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199643097.003.0001
2012-01-01
Abstract:Since the middle of the twentieth century, capitalism has worked tremendously well in much of East Asia. The remarkable development of first Japan and then South Korea (henceforth Korea), Singapore, and Taiwan into worldclass economies in defiance of an array of political and social challenges both at home and abroad earned them the hyperbole of the East Asian miracle. The extraordinary episodes of high growth since the 1970s in the Southeast Asian resource-based countries, specifically Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand, displayed striking similarities in terms of policy settings and economic outcomes. China and Vietnam, the two nominally socialist countries, made serious and sustained efforts to turn their economic systems in an unequivocally capitalist direction during the final two decades of the twentieth century, achieving equally remarkable growth outcomes. East Asian capitalism also appeared to be highly resilient, rebounding quickly from the global downturn of the early 1980s, the more challenging Asian crisis of the late 1990s, and most recently the global financial crisis of the late 2000s. By comparison to those of many other developing and emerging market countries, the experiences of capitalist development in many East Asian economies have been exemplary and enviable. However, the same forces that have made East Asian capitalism so dynamic for so long have inevitably brought with them formidable and ever-present challenges. The continuous process of capital accumulation and the perennial reconstitution of markets as the organizing principle of the economy have unleashed constant political, demographic, and economic pressures. The strains of capitalist development have been acutely manifest in widening income gaps, persistent corruption, environmental degradation, and governance failures across the region. Internal social and political conflicts have OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 9/5/2012, SPi