Hydropedology in the Ridge and Valley

Ying Zhao,Jialiang Tang,Chris Graham,Qing Zhu,Ken Takagi,Henry Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386941-8.00012-5
2012-01-01
Abstract:This chapter investigates soil moisture spatial-temporal patterns and preferential flow dynamics in two contrasting landscapes in the Ridge and Valley Physiographic Region in eastern United States: 1) the Shale Hills is a steep-sloped forestland, 7.9 ha, with a ratio of elevation change over total area (E/A) of 6.8, and 2) the Kepler Farm is a more gently rolling cropland, 19.5 ha, with the E/A ratio of 1.2. Similarities and differences between the two landscapes were examined based on multiple years' soil and hydrologic monitoring. Through a series of statistical analyses, we found that: 1) Soil moisture spatial correlation length was an order of magnitude shorter in the Shale Hills (20-40 m) as compared to the Kepler Farm (100-153 m), suggesting a greater spatial variability within a shorter distance in the Shale Hills that was aligned with topography. Regression kriging with terrain attributes was found optimal for interpolating soil hydrologic properties in the Shale Hills, while ordinary kriging was optimal at the Kepler Farm; 2) Soil moisture spatial variability across the Shale Hills increased exponentially with catchment-wide wetness, whereas that increased linearly at the Kepler Farm. This was in part due to different landscape configurations and the E/A ratios; 3) The mean relative difference (MRD) of soil moisture was smaller at the Kepler Farm (-55 to 56%) than that in the Shale Hills (-80 to 81%) over the same time period analyzed in time stability analysis, reflecting the overall larger spatial variation of soil moisture in the Shale Hills. Inversely, standard deviation of MRD was slightly larger in the Kepler Farm (4-46%) than that in the Shale Hills (3-28%), implying slightly stronger temporal dynamics in the Kepler Farm due to cropping impacts; 4) The primary Empirical Orthogonal Functions explained 76-90% variation of soil moisture in the Shale Hills, but only 31-67% variation at the Kepler Farm, reflecting the dominant control on soil moisture by terrain in the Shale Hills, while soil properties showed stronger influence on soil moisture at the Kepler Farm; 5) The Shale Hills had overall averaged 37% frequency of preferential flow occurrence during 175 rainfall events in 2007-2009, while the Kepler Farm had 19% during 139 rainfall events occurred in 2008-2010. This study illustrated the spatial complexity and temporal dynamics in soil moisture patterns and preferential flow dynamics that were controlled by the interactions of terrain, soil, and vegetation, and that such interactions changed with landscape characteristics, seasonal wetness, and soil depth.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?