Trade and Mobility: the Political Economy of Interindustry Labor Mobility in Globalization

Qiang Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1465108

2009-01-01

Abstract:Globalization has become part of the structural reality of the modern political economy with which governments either have to engage carefully or ignore with great cost. Existing literature has proposed the compensation (Cameron 1978) or social risk insurance (Rodrik 1997) hypotheses to explain the government response to increasing involvement in globalization of trade. In this paper I discuss an under-explored relationship between involvement to international trade and levels of interindustry labor mobility. From a general equilibrium model I show that interindustry labor mobility can have implications on income distribution among labor owners. High labor mobility levels entail that all labor owners across industries will earn similar income commensurate with their labor market skills regardless of the differentiating impact of globalization, hence alleviating the negative consequences of globalization; on the other hand, low labor mobility levels tend to do the opposite and aggravate the negative distributional effects of globalization. I distinguish two scenarios based on different assumptions about the endogeneity of interindustry labor mobility. In both scenarios I expect countries more involved in globalization to have higher labor mobility levels. In discussing the possibility of endogenous labor mobility, I explore what policies can change labor mobility levels in what directions. I test these claims on both OECD and global samples. In empirical analysis, I make use of a newly constructed dataset on interindustry labor mobility levels of all countries from 1961 to 2003.