Welcome the Disposition E ® Ect and Momentum ¤
Mark Grinblatt,Bing Han
2001-01-01
Abstract:The Disposition E®ect and Momentum Prior experimental and empirical research documents that many investors have a lower propensity to sell those stocks on which they have a capital loss. This behavioral phenomenon, known as \the disposition e®ect," has implications for equilibrium prices. We investigate the temporal pattern of stock prices in an equilibrium that aggregates the demand functions of both rational and disposition investors. The disposition e®ect creates a spread between a stock's fundamental value { the stock price that would exist in the absence of a disposition e®ect { and its market price. Even when a stock's fundamental value follows a random walk, and thus is unpredictable, its equilibrium price will tend to underreact to information. Spread convergence, arising from the random evolution of fundamental values and updating of the reference prices, generates predictable equilibrium prices. This convergence implies that stocks with large past price run-ups and stocks on which most investors experienced capital gains have higher expected returns than those that have experienced large declines and capital losses. The pro ̄tability of a momentum strategy, which makes use of this spread, depends on the path of past stock prices. Cross-sectional empirical tests of the model ̄nd that stocks with large aggregate unrealized capital gains tend to have higher expected returns than stocks with large aggregate unrealized capital losses and that this capital gains \overhang" appears to be the key variable that generates the pro ̄tability of a momentum strategy. When this capital gains variable is used as a regressor along with past returns and volume to predict future returns, the momentum e®ect disappears. Momentum, which is the persistence in the returns of stocks over horizons between three months and one year, remains one of the most puzzling anomalies in ̄nance. Jegadeesh and Titman (1993), for example, found that past winning stocks, as measured by returns over the prior six months tended to subsequently outperform past losing stocks by about twelve percent per year. Various explanations for momentum have been advanced, but few have stood up to rigorous empirical tests or calibrations. Moreover, most of these explanations are more rooted in attempts to explain momentum than in developing general theories of how demand for stocks a®ects equilibrium pricing. Momentum-motivated theories have often been categorized as belonging to the ̄eld of behavioral ̄nance, there is a seemingly unrelated branch of the literature in behavioral ̄nance that documents stylized facts about investor behavior. It is motivated by experiments on individual investors and observations of their behavior in real ̄nancial markets. It rarely attempts to link its stylized facts about investor behavior to equilibrium prices. Perhaps the most well-documented behavioral regularity in this literature is what Shefrin and Statman (1985) termed \the disposition e®ect." This is the tendency of investors to hold onto their losing stocks to a greater extent than they hold onto their winners. This paper analyzes how aggregate demand and equilibrium prices evolve over time when they are a®ected by the existence of a ̄xed proportion of investors who exhibit the disposition e®ect. It is possible to analytically prove that if some investors are subject to the disposition e®ect, then stocks with aggregate unrealized capital gains tend to outperform stocks with aggregate unrealized capital losses. This paper shows, both theoretically and empirically, that the disposition e®ect may account for the tendency of past winning stocks to subsequently outperform past losing stocks. The intuition for our model is rather simple. Assume for the moment that some investors, the disposition investors, perturb otherwise rational demand functions for a stock they own because they have experienced unrealized capital gains or losses in the stock. Such investors would tend to have higher demand for losing stocks than for winning stocks, other things being equal. If demand for that same stock by other investors is not perfectly elastic, then such a demand perturbation, induced by a disposition e®ect, tends to generate price underreaction to public information. Stocks that have been privy to good news in the past would have excess selling pressure relative to stocks that have been privy to adverse The disposition e®ect is sometimes linked to, but is really distinct from loss aversion. Loss aversion occurs when two conditions are met: (i) the decline in utility for a loss (measured relative to a reference point) exceeds the increase in utility for an equal sized gain (relative to the same reference point); (ii) a gamble that is always a loss relative to the reference point generates higher utility than a certain loss with the same mean while the reverse preference applies to gambles that are always gains. In a market with a single risky asset, one can see how an investor might be more likely to substitute a risk-free asset for a risky asset in a gain situation (where utility is locally concave) than a loss situation (where utility is locally convex). However, in a multiasset multiperiod framework, it is necessary to argue that reference prices change to induce substitution of one risky asset with a paper gain or loss for another. This complex setting is atypical in the modeling of loss aversion.