Abstract:Mixed-phase clouds are not well represented in climate and weather forecasting models, due to a lack of the key processes controlling their life cycle. Developing methods to study these clouds is therefore essential, despite the complexity of mixed-phase cloud processes and the difficulty of observing two cloud phases simultaneously. We propose in this paper a new method to retrieve the microphysical properties of mixed-phase clouds, ice clouds and supercooled water clouds using airborne or satellite radar and lidar measurements, called VarPy-mix. This new approach extends an existing variational method developed for ice cloud retrieval using lidar, radar and passive radiometers. We assume that the lidar attenuated backscatter β at 532 nm is more sensitive to particle concentration and is consequently mainly sensitive to the presence of supercooled water. In addition, radar reflectivity Z at 95 GHz is sensitive to the size of hydrometeors and hence more sensitive to the presence of ice particles. Consequently, in the mixed phase the supercooled droplets are retrieved with the lidar signal and the ice particles with the radar signal, meaning that the retrievals rely strongly on a priori and error values. This method retrieves simultaneously the visible extinction for ice α ice and liquid α liq particles, the ice and liquid water contents IWC and LWC, the effective radius of ice r e,ice and liquid r e,liq particles, and the ice and liquid number concentrations N ice and N liq . Moreover, total extinction α tot , total water content (TWC) and total number concentration N tot can also be estimated. As the retrieval of ice and liquid is different, it is necessary to correctly identify each phase of the cloud. To this end, a cloud-phase classification is used as input to the algorithm and has been adapted for mixed-phase retrieval. The data used in this study are from DARDAR-MASK v2.23 products, based on the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) and Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) observations from the CALIPSO and CloudSat satellites, respectively, belonging to the A-Train constellation launched in 2006. Airborne in situ measurements performed on 7 April 2007 during the Arctic Study of Tropospheric Aerosol, Clouds and Radiation (ASTAR) campaign and collected under the track of CloudSat–CALIPSO are compared with the retrievals of the new algorithm to validate its performance. Visible extinctions, water contents, effective radii and number concentrations derived from in situ measurements and the retrievals showed similar trends and are globally in good agreement. The mean percent error between the retrievals and in situ measurements is 39 % for α liq , 398 % for α ice , 49 % for LWC and 75 % for IWC. It is also important to note that temporal and spatial collocations are not perfect, with a maximum spatial shift of 1.68 km and a maximum temporal shift of about 10 min between the two platforms. In addition, the sensitivity of remote sensing and that of in situ measurements is not the same, and in situ measurement uncertainties are between 25 % and 60 %.

An intercomparison of radar-based liquid cloud microphysics retrievals and implication for model evaluation studies

An Intercomparison of Radar-Based Liquid Cloud Microphysics Retrievals and Implications for Model Evaluation Studies

Simultaneous Retrieval Algorithm of Water Cloud Optical and Microphysical Properties by High-Spectral-Resolution Lidar

An investigation into the relationship between liquid water content and cloud number concentration in the stratiform clouds over north China

Toward Understanding of Differences in Current Cloud Retrievals of ARM Ground‐based Measurements

Intercomparisons on the vertical profiles of cloud microphysical properties from CloudSat retrievals over the North China Plain

A Comparison among Four Different Retrieval Methods for Ice-Cloud Properties Using Data from CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS

A Novel Liquid Water Content Retrieval Method Based on Mass Absorption for Single-Wavelength Cloud Radar

A Method for Retrieving Cloud Microphysical Properties Using Combined Measurement of Millimeter-Wave Radar and Lidar

Evaluation of four ground-based retrievals of cloud droplet number concentration in marine stratocumulus with aircraft in situ measurements

Analysis of Integrated Cloud Liquid and Precipitable Water Vapor Retrievals from Microwave Radiometers During the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean Project

Application of Aircraft Observations over Beijing in Cloud Microphysical Property Retrievals from CloudSat

Comparison of cloud properties between cloudsat retrievals and airplane measurements in mixed-phase cloud layers of weak convective and stratus clouds

Profiles of MBL Cloud and Drizzle Microphysical Properties Retrieved From Ground‐Based Observations and Validated by Aircraft In Situ Measurements Over the Azores

Cloud properties derived from surface MFRSR measurements and comparison with GOES results at the ARM SGP Site

Evaluation of Cloud and Precipitation Response to Aerosols in WRF-Chem with Satellite Observations

Evaluation of Physical Microphysical Property Retrieval Algorithms During the 2020 IMPACTS Field Campaign

Why we need radar, lidar, and solar radiance observations to constrain ice cloud microphysics

Lidar–radar synergistic method to retrieve ice, supercooled water and mixed-phase cloud properties

Inter-comparison of Various Approaches of Ground-Based Active Remote Sensing of Cloud Water Content

Evaluation of liquid cloud albedo susceptibility in E3SM using coupled eastern North Atlantic surface and satellite retrievals