Abstract:Some non-structural carbohydrates, especially starch, escape ruminal fermentation, are converted into glucose, and are absorbed from the small intestine. This glucose provides an important source of energy, and its usage is more efficient than glucose from carbohydrates which are fermented as short chain fatty acids in the rumen and, subsequently, undergo hepatic gluconeogenesis. Tibetan sheep graze on the harsh Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) all year round and their carbohydrate and energy intakes fluctuate greatly with seasonal forage availability. Consequently, a high capacity to absorb glucose from the small intestine would be particularly beneficial for Tibetan sheep to allow them to cope with the inconsistent dietary intakes. This study examined how the small intestinal morphology and sugar transporters' expression of Tibetan and Small-tailed Han (Han) sheep respond to fluctuating energy intakes under the harsh conditions of the QTP. Han sheep graze on the QTP only in summer and are generally raised in feedlots. Twenty-four Tibetan sheep and 24 Han sheep, all wethers, were assigned randomly to four groups (n = 6 per breed/group), with each group offered a diet differing in digestible energy content: 8.21, 9.33, 10.45 and 11.57 MJ/kg DM. After 49 d, all sheep were slaughtered, tissues of the small intestine were collected, and measurements were made of the morphology and glucose transporters and the related regulation gene expressions. At intakes of low energy levels, Tibetan sheep had a greater villus surface area in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum and higher mRNA expression of sodium-dependent glucose transporter 1 in the duodenum and ileum (P < 0.05) than Han sheep. In the glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) mediated glucose absorption pathway, Tibetan sheep had higher GLUT2 and taste receptor family 1 member 2 and 3 mRNA expressions than Han sheep in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum (P < 0.05). We concluded that the differences between breeds indicated a greater glucose absorption capacity in the small intestine of Tibetan than Han sheep, which would confer an advantage to Tibetan over Han sheep to an inconsistent energy intake on the harsh QTP. These findings suggested that ruminants raised under harsh environmental conditions with highly fluctuating dietary intakes, as is often the case in grazing ruminants worldwide, are able to absorb glucose from the small intestine to a greater extent than ruminants raised under more moderate conditions. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Small Intestinal Morphology and Sugar Transporters Expression when Consuming Diets of Different Energy Levels: Comparison Between Tibetan and Small-Tailed Han Sheep

Hypothalamic regulation of energy homoeostasis when consuming diets of different energy concentrations: comparison between Tibetan and Small-tailed Han sheep

Energy Substrate Metabolism in Skeletal Muscle and Liver when Consuming Diets of Different Energy Levels: Comparison Between Tibetan and Small-tailed Han Sheep

Effect of Dietary Energy on Digestibilities, Rumen Fermentation, Urinary Purine Derivatives and Serum Metabolites in Tibetan and Small-Tailed Han Sheep.

Tibetan Sheep Are Better Able to Cope with Low Energy Intake Than Small-tailed Han Sheep Due to Lower Maintenance Energy Requirements and Higher Nutrient Digestibilities

Tibetan sheep have a high capacity to absorb and to regulate metabolism of SCFA in the rumen epithelium to adapt to low energy intake

Effects of Diets with Different Energy and Protein Levels on mRNA Expression of Glucose Transporters in Tan Sheep

Effect of Level of Oat Hay Intake on Apparent Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation and Urinary Purine Derivatives in Tibetan and Fine-Wool Sheep

Tibetan Sheep Require Less Energy Intake Than Small-Tailed Han Sheep for N Balance when Offered a Low Protein Diet

Rumen microbiota helps Tibetan sheep obtain energy more efficiently to survive in the extreme environment of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Rumen Fermentation—Microbiota—Host Gene Expression Interactions to Reveal the Adaptability of Tibetan Sheep in Different Periods

Effects of the Interaction between Rumen Microbiota Density–VFAs–Hepatic Gluconeogenesis on the Adaptability of Tibetan Sheep to Plateau

Apparent Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation and Nitrogen Balance in Tibetan and Fine-Wool Sheep Offered Forage-Concentrate Diets Differing in Nitrogen Concentration

Interactions Between Rumen Microbes, VFAs, and Host Genes Regulate Nutrient Absorption and Epithelial Barrier Function During Cold Season Nutritional Stress in Tibetan Sheep

Dietary Supplements During the Cold Season Increase Rumen Microbial Abundance and Improve Rumen Epithelium Development in Tibetan Sheep.

Interactions among Rumen Fermentation Characteristics, the Microbiota, and Host Gene Expression in Response to Ambient Temperature Fluctuations in Tibetan Sheep

Unique rumen micromorphology and microbiota–metabolite interactions: features and strategies for Tibetan sheep adaptation to the plateau

Effects of Dietary Energy and Protein Levels on mRNA Expression of Small Peptide and Amino Acid Transporters in Small Intestine of Tan Sheep

A Comparison of Growth Performance, Blood Parameters, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community of Tibetan Sheep When Fattened by Pasture Grazing versus Stall Feeding

Effects of Soil Ingestion on Nutrient Digestibility and Rumen Bacterial Diversity of Tibetan Sheep.

Carcass Parameters and Meat Quality of Tibetan Sheep and Small-tailed Han Sheep Consuming Diets of Low-Protein Content and Different Energy Yields.