P4‐046: TBD

Zhang Chen,Alan Evans,Yong He,Gaolang Gong,Pedro Rosa‐Neto,Lingzhong Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2066
2011-01-01
Abstract:Modularity underlies the functionality of many complex networks ranging from social to biological networks. Recent studies have revealed a highly organized modular architecture in the cortical network of normal adults. However, it remains unknown how this modularity is affected in neurodegenerative diseases such as AD. Here, using cortical thickness, we investigated the modular organization of the cortical structural networks from T1 images of 97 normal controls (age: 60-94, female/male:71/26) and 92 AD patients (age: 62-96, female/male: 54/38) (http://www.oasis-brains.org). Cortical surface was segmented into 78 regions based on the automated anatomical labelling (AAL) and regional cortical thickness was calculated using CIVET pipeline at Montreal Neurological Institute. The brain structural networks (78x78) for both groups were obtained by calculating the absolute Pearson correlation coefficients across individuals between every pair of regions. The modular organization of both groups were defined by determining the maximum modularity Q of the brain structural networks using Newman's definition. Using the modular organization of NC as a base model, we then compared the modular structures, intra- and inter-module connectivity between the two group. Compared with the NC network modular organization, AD network has significantly reduced modularity (-41%, p < 0.001). The NC network are composed of modules (Figure) that are corresponding to the main functional domains such as strategic/executive, auditory/language and sensorimotor/spatial functions. The AD brain network demonstrated a more functionally generalized and geographically localized (anterior vs. posterior) modular organization (Figure). Compared with the NC network modules, AD networks exhibited a significantly reduced modular strength in the strategic/executive and mnemonic/language modules and inter-modular strength between the strategic/executive/language and visual modules.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?