Measuring Income Distribution Indicators such as Inequality and Poverty based on Grouped Data:A Methodological Assessment Considering Data Truncation
WAN Guanghua,JIANG Weirui,HU Xiaoshan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12012/cjoe2022-0092
2023-01-01
Abstract:Indicators such as income inequality, poverty and the share of middle-income groups are widely concerned by policy makers, society, academia and even the media, and are also important determinants of many economic and social factors（e.g.growth, consumption, investment, education, health, crime, etc.）. However, rarely literature included them in empirical models, mainly due to data deficiency. Furthermore, observations at the top and bottom of household survey data are often missing,causing bias in the empirical estimates. Using data from 2018 China Family Panel Studies（CFPS）, this paper evaluates the method proposed by Shorrocks and Wan（2009） for “ungrouping” individual observations based on grouped data to estimate indicators of inequality and poverty, then introduces conditional distributions to this method considering the missing data at the top and bottom of the income distribution. The results show that “ungrouping” bias will keep within an acceptable range if assume variables follow Dagum distribution, rather than the lognormal distribution used by Shorrocks and Wan（2009）. In addition, this improvement to Shorrocks and Wan’s（2009） method significantly reduces the “ungrouping” bias caused by data truncation, and the Dagum distribution still prevails under this method. It is suggested that subsequent research can “ungrouping” the income grouped data from provincial statistical yearbooks under the assumption of the Dagum distribution, and then measure the indicators of income inequality, poverty and middle-income share, etc. before conducting economic analyses. At least relevant indicators should be considered in the empirical study in order to reduce the bias of the relevant models.