Publisher’s Note: Improved Measurement of the Branching Fraction and Energy Spectrum Ofη′fromυ(1s)decays [phys. Rev. D74, 092006 (2006)]

O. Aquines,Z. Li,A. Lopez,S. Mehrabyan,H. Mendez,J. Ramirez,G. S. Huang,D. H. Miller,V. Pavlunin,B. Sanghi,I. P. J. Shipsey,B. Xin,G. S. Adams,M. Anderson,J. P. Cummings,I. Danko,J. Napolitano,Q. He,J. Insler,H. Muramatsu,C. S. Park,E. H. Thorndike,F. Yang,T. E. Coan,Y. S. Gao,F. Liu,M. Artuso,S. Blusk,J. Butt,J. Li,N. Menaa,R. Mountain,S. Nisar,K. Randrianarivony,R. Redjimi,R. Sia,T. Skwarnicki,S. Stone,J. C. Wang,K. Zhang,S. E. Csorna,G. Bonvicini,D. Cinabro,M. Dubrovin,A. Lincoln,D. M. Asner,K. W. Edwards,R. A. Briere,I. Brock,J. Chen,T. Ferguson,G. Tatishvili,H. Vogel,M. E. Watkins,J. L. Rosner,N. E. Adam,J. P. Alexander,K. Berkelman,D. G. Cassel,J. E. Duboscq,K. M. Ecklund,R. Ehrlich,L. Fields,R. S. Galik,L. Gibbons,R. Gray,S. W. Gray,D. L. Hartill,B. K. Heltsley,D. Hertz,C. D. Jones,J. Kandaswamy,D. L. Kreinick,V. E. Kuznetsov,H. Mahlke-Kruger,P. U. E. Onyisi,J. R. Patterson,D. Peterson,J. Pivarski,D. Riley,A. Ryd,A. J. Sadoff,H. Schwarthoff,X. Shi,S. Stroiney,W. M. Sun,T. Wilksen,M. Weinberger,S. B. Athar,R. Patel,V. Potlia,J. Yelton,P. Rubin,C. Cawlfield,B. I. Eisenstein,I. Karliner,D. Kim,N. Lowrey,P. Naik,C. Sedlack,M. Selen,E. J. White,J. Wiss,M. R. Shepherd,D. Besson,T. K. Pedlar,D. Cronin-Hennessy,K. Y. Gao,D. T. Gong,J. Hietala,Y. Kubota,T. Klein,B. W. Lang,R. Poling,A. W. Scott,A. Smith,P. Zweber,S. Dobbs,Z. Metreveli,K. K. Seth,A. Tomaradze,J. Ernst,H. Severini,S. A. Dytman,W. Love,V. Savinov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.75.119902
IF: 5.407
2007-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:We present an improved measurement of the $\eta'$ meson energy spectrum in $\Upsilon(1S)$ decays, using 1.2 fb^{-1} of data taken at the $\Upsilon(1S)$ center-of-mass energy with the CLEO III detector. We compare our results with models of the $\eta'$ gluonic form factor that have been suggested to explain the unexpectedly large $B\to \eta 'X_s$ rate. Models based on perturbative QCD fail to fit the data for large $\eta '$ energies, and thus an explanation outside the realm of the Standard Model or an improved understanding of non-perturbative QCD effects may be needed to account for this large rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?