Erratum: Improved QCD-motivated heavy-quark potentials with explicit<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MS</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>―</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>dependence

Yu-Qi Chen,Yu-Ping Kuang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.46.1165
IF: 5.407
1993-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:We propose two models for a heavy-quark potential with possible natural QCD interpretations. The potentials approach the two-loop perturbative QCD formula at short distance and a linear confining potential at large distance, and their predicted $c\overline{c}$ and $b\overline{b}$ spectra all fit the data very well for ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{\stackrel{-}{\mathrm{MS}}}$ in the range 100-500 MeV, where $\stackrel{-}{\mathrm{MS}}$ denotes the modified minimal subtraction scheme. Furthermore, the potentials are described directly in coordinate space with explicit ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{\stackrel{-}{\mathrm{MS}}}$ dependence so that they are convenient for practical calculations. Some of their phenomenological predictions are given, especially, in the picture regarding a confining potential as a scalar exchange. The predicted masses of $\ensuremath{\psi}(1^{1}P_{1})$ and $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(1^{1}P_{1})$ are higher than the center-of-gravity values of the $1^{3}P_{J}$ states by 0.9-1.8 MeV and 0.4-0.7 MeV, respectively, for ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{\stackrel{-}{\mathrm{MS}}}$ in the range 100-200 MeV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?