Abstract:Abstract Background and objectives: Motivated from a study on breast cancer, we consider the problem of evaluating a statistical hypothesis when some model characteristics are potentially non or weakly identifiable from observed data. Such scenarios are common in longitudinal studies for evaluating a covariate effect when dropouts may be informative. The hypothesis related to treatment effects may not be testable nonparametrically, with untestable model restrictions necessary for inference. A popular approach is to assume a finite dimensional model and to fix a minimal set of parameters, called sensitivity parameters, conditional upon which hypothesized parameters are assumed identifiable. These profile models, viewed as a functional of the secondary or sensitivity parameters, form the basis of sensitivity analysis. In the current literature, however, inference regarding significance of the covariates is ad hoc, ignoring that multiple tests are conducted and that the working model may be misspecified. Methods and results: In this paper, we propose conservatively testing the null hypothesis of interest across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic. The test must account for the facts that inferences are carried out simultaneously across the entire range of the sensitivity parameters and that the model may be misspecified under certain values of the sensitivity parameters, as might occur if a nonignorable model is fit, when, in reality, missingness is ignorable. We characterize the limiting distribution of the statistic as a functional of processes in the sensitivity parameters, which involves a careful theoretical analysis of its behavior under model misspecification. In practice, we suggest a simple yet flexible resampling procedure to implement the infimum test as well as to construct confidence bands for simultaneous pointwise tests across all values of the sensitivity parameters. The methodology's practical utility is illustrated in simulations and an analysis of quality-of-life outcomes from a longitudinal study on breast cancer. Interestingly in this example, a covariate effect on cancer outcomes is detected over a wide range of the sensitivity parameter when a Wald test that assumes identifiability fails. Implications and next steps: The key implication of this work is that the hypothesis of interest can be conservatively evaluated across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic over the space of these parameters. A key assumption of this paper is that the working model is finite dimensional although the full specification of distribution of the data is not required. The methodology should be broadly applicable to infinite dimensional models, such as survival models for censored data. This extension is the focus of current research work. Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(10 Suppl):A6.

A Unified Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Equilibrium Displacement Models: Comment

Hyper-differential sensitivity analysis with respect to model discrepancy: Optimal solution updating

Hyper-differential sensitivity analysis with respect to model discrepancy: Mathematics and computation

Sensitivity analysis for expected utility maximization in incomplete Brownian market models

Hyper-differential sensitivity analysis with respect to model discrepancy: Posterior Optimal Solution Sampling

Kernel-based sensitivity analysis for (excursion) sets

Discrepancy Measures for Global Sensitivity Analysis

The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support

Hyper-Differential Sensitivity Analysis of Uncertain Parameters in PDE-Constrained Optimization

Sensitivity analysis for biomedical models.

A Monte Carlo method for estimating sensitivities of reflected diffusions in convex polyhedral domains

Sensitivity Analysis for Computationally Expensive Models using Optimization and Objective-oriented Surrogate Approximations

Accelerated Computations of Sensitivities for xVA

Model-assisted sensitivity analysis for treatment effects under unmeasured confounding via regularized calibrated estimation

On "Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable": Discussions on Misspecification and Suggestions of Sensitivity Analyses

Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions

A general framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis with respect to distribution parameters

Abstract A6: A Global Sensitivity Test for Evaluating Hypotheses with Non- and Weakly Identifiable Statistical Models: an Application to Breast Cancer Outcomes

Conditional expectation method for estimating parameter sensitivity of unreliability

Finite-Dimensional Models for Response Analysis

Sensitivity Analysis for Dynamic Discrete Choice Models