Abstract:Problem definition: Firms heavily invest in big data technologies to collect consumer data and infer consumer preferences for price discrimination. However, consumers can use technological devices to manipulate their data and fool firms to obtain better deals. We examine how a firm invests in collecting consumer data and makes pricing decisions and whether it should disclose its scope of data collection to consumers who can manipulate their data. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretic model to consider a market in which a firm caters to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for a product. The firm collects consumer data to identify their types and issue an individualized price, whereas consumers can incur a cost to manipulate data and mimic the other type. We find that when the firm does not disclose its scope of data collection to consumers, it collects more consumer data. When the firm discloses its scope of data collection, it reduces data collection even when collecting more data is costless. The optimal scope of data collection increases when it is more costly for consumers to manipulate data but decreases when consumer demand becomes more heterogeneous. Moreover, a lower cost for consumers to manipulate data can be detrimental to both the firm and consumers. Lastly, disclosure of data collection scope increases firm profit, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that a firm should adjust its scope of data collection and prices based on whether the firm discloses the data collection scope, consumers’ manipulation cost, and demand heterogeneity. Public policies should require firms to disclose their data collection scope to increase consumer surplus and social welfare. Even without such a mandatory disclosure policy, firms should voluntarily disclose their data collection scope to increase profit. Moreover, public educational programs that train consumers to manipulate their data or raise their awareness of manipulation tools can ultimately hurt consumers and firms.

Managing Digital Piracy under Consumer Valuation Uncertainty: the Roles of Product Demonstrations and Antipiracy Measures

Marine Piracy Prediction and Prevention: Policy Implications

Dynamic Pricing Model of Software Products with Considering Piracy Tolerance

Software Piracy: A Game Analysis between Firm's Strategic Choice and Government Policy

Monetizing Showrooming

Pay-What-You-Want Pricing in the Digital Product Marketplace: A Feasible Alternative to Piracy Prevention?

Software Piracy and Ethical Decision Making Behavior of Chinese Consumers

Investigating the Clarity Dimension of Social Norms: How Normative Ambiguity on Digital Piracy Intentions

Purchasing Pirated Software: an Initial Examination of Chinese Consumers

Impact of Online Renting on Software Piracy.

Research on Pricing Model and Simulation of Software Products with Considering Sampling-Trail Strategy

Dynamic supervision of counterfeit products based on blockchain technology: A differential game on goodwill accumulation

An Economic Analysis of Platform Protection in the Presence of Content Substitutability

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management

An Economic Analysis of Providing Free Electronic Version

Optimizing investment strategies for digital music copyrights under uncertainty

Preventive portfolio against data-selling ransomware—A game theory of encryption and deception

Digital Piracy: Assessing the Contributions of an Integrated Self‐Control Theory and Social Learning Theory Using Structural Equation Modeling

An Experimental Study on the Sale of Counterfeit Products under Monitoring Policies

Fighting Strategies in a Market with Counterfeits

How a Leader Firm Responds to Competition: Protecting Digital Assets Amidst Imitation, Substitution, and Entry Threats