Abstract:This paper presents the dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network for deepfake detection, which integrates spatial and frequency domain features to enhance detection accuracy and robustness. The network includes a spatial forgery feature extraction module, a frequency forgery feature extraction module, and a spatial‐frequency feature fusion module, using attention mechanisms to extract and fuse features. Extensive experiments demonstrate that dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network outperforms existing methods, offering superior generalization and robustness across various deepfake datasets. In recent years, face forgery detection has gained significant attention, resulting in considerable advancements. However, most existing methods rely on CNNs to extract artefacts from the spatial domain, overlooking the pervasive frequency‐domain artefacts present in deepfake content, which poses challenges in achieving robust and generalized detection. To address these issues, we propose the dual‐stream frequency—spatial fusion network is proposed for deepfake detection. The dual‐stream frequency‐spatial fusion network consists of three components: the spatial forgery feature extraction module, the frequency forgery feature extraction module, and the spatial–frequency feature fusion module. The spatial forgery feature extraction module employs spatial‐channel attention to extract spatial domain features, targeting artefacts in the spatial domain. The frequency forgery feature extraction module leverages the focused linear attention to detect frequency domain anomalies in internal regions, enabling the identification of generated content. The spatial–frequency feature fusion module then fuses forgery features extracted from both the spatial and frequency domains, facilitating accurate detection of splicing artefacts and internally generated forgeries. This approach enhances the model's ability to more accurately capture forgery characteristics. Extensive experiments on several widely‐used benchmarks demonstrate that our carefully designed network exhibits superior generalization and robustness, significantly improving deepfake detection performance.

Deepfake Video Detection Using 3D-Attentional Inception Convolutional Neural Network

Hierarchical Supervisions with Two-Stream Network for Deepfake Detection.

Multi-attentional Deepfake Detection

Detecting Deepfake Videos Based on Spatiotemporal Attention and Convolutional LSTM

A lightweight 3D convolutional neural network for deepfake detection

Refining Localized Attention Features with Multi-Scale Relationships for Enhanced Deepfake Detection in Spatial-Frequency Domain

Compressed Deepfake Video Detection Based on 3D Spatiotemporal Trajectories

Deep Convolutional Pooling Transformer for Deepfake Detection

Deepfake detection: Enhancing performance with spatiotemporal texture and deep learning feature fusion

Learning spatial‐frequency interaction for generalizable deepfake detection

Video Detection Method Based on Temporal and Spatial Foundations for Accurate Verification of Authenticity

Dynamic Difference Learning with Spatio-temporal Correlation for Deepfake Video Detection

A defensive attention mechanism to detect deepfake content across multiple modalities

3D CNN Architectures and Attention Mechanisms for Deepfake Detection

Spatio-temporal Features for Generalized Detection of Deepfake Videos

CSTAN: A Deepfake Detection Network with CST Attention for Superior Generalization

Spatial-frequency feature fusion based deepfake detection through knowledge distillation

DeepFake detection method based on multi-scale interactive dual-stream network

Real-Time Deepfake Video Detection Using Eye Movement Analysis with a Hybrid Deep Learning Approach

Spatiotemporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detection

Temporal Feature Prediction in Audio–Visual Deepfake Detection