Effect of Pressure Controlled Volume Guaranteed Ventilation During Pulmonary Resection in Children.

Change Zhu,Rufang Zhang,Shenghua Yu,Yuting Zhang,Rong Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05693-y

IF: 4.6

2022-01-01

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Abstract The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in children requiring one lung ventilation during pulmonary resection. Patients were randomly assigned to the lung protective ventilation combined with pressure controlled volume guaranteed group (PCV-VG group) or the lung protective ventilation combined with volume controlled ventilation group (VCV group). Both groups received tidal-volume ventilation of 8 ml kg−1 body weight during two lung ventilation and 6 ml kg−1 during OLV, with sustained 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure. Data collections were mainly performed at 10 min after induction of anaesthesia during TLV (T1), 5 min after OLV initiation (T2) and 5 min after complete CO2 insufflations (T3). In total, 63 patients were randomly assigned to the VCV (n = 31) and PCV-VG (n = 32) groups. The PCV-VG group exhibited lower PIP than the VCV group at T1 (16.8 ± 2.3 vs. 18.7 ± 2.7 cmH2O, P = 0.001), T2 (20.2 ± 2.7 vs. 22.4 ± 3.3 cmH2O, P = 0.001), and T3 (23.8 ± 3.2 vs. 26.36 ± 3.7 cmH2O, P = 0.01). Static compliance was higher in the PCV-VG group at T1, T2, and T3 (P = 0.01). After anaesthesia induction, lung aeration deteriorated, but with no immediate postoperative difference in both groups. Postoperative lung aeration improved and returned to normal from 2.5 h postextubation in both groups. PH was lower and PaCO2 was higher in VCV group than PCV-VG group during one lung ventilation. No differences were observed in PaO2-FiO2-ratio at T2 and T3, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, intraoperative desaturation and the length of hospital stay. In paediatric patients, who underwent pulmonary resection requiring one lung ventilation, PCV-VG was superior to VCV in its ability to provide lower PIP, higher static compliance and lower PaCO2 at one lung ventilation during pneumothorax. However, its beneficial effects on different pathological situations in pediatric patients need more investigation.