Correlation and Prognostic Value of CT-detected Extramural Venous Invasion and Pathological Lymph-Vascular Invasion in Colon Cancer

Guan Zhen,Zhang Xiao-Yan,Li Xiao-Ting,Sun Rui-Jia,Lu Qiao-Yuan,Wu Ai-Wen,Sun Ying-Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03414-7
IF: 2.4
2022-01-01
Abdominal Radiology
Abstract:To explore the association between CT-detected extramural vascular invasion (ctEMVI) and lymph-vascular invasion (LVI) in colon cancer, and analyze the prognostic value of ctEMVI in different conditions of LVI. This single-center, retrospective study included 448 colon cancer patients from January 2015 to December 2017. Preoperative CT features and clinical and pathological data were collected. Associations between ctEMVI and LVI were tested. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed. Multivariate Cox regression was performed adjusted with propensity score(PS). Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare survival differences between the ctEMVI and LVI groups. A 1:1 patient pairing was conducted using PS matching to assess the prognostic effect of ctEMVI in LVI subgroups. Among the 448 patients, there were 261 men and 187 women, with an average age of 63 ± 12 years. The coincidence rate of ctEMVI and LVI was 73.9%. The k coefficient for identifying ctEMVI was 0.84. ctEMVI and LVI were both independent risk factors for overall survival (ctEMVI: HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–5.5; LVI: HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2–4.1) and metastasis-free survival (ctEMVI: HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7–6.4; LVI: HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.5) adjusted with PS. In the LVI(+) subgroup, the prognosis of ctEMVI(+) was significantly worse than that of ctEMVI(−); in the LVI(−) subgroup, the prognosis of different ctEMVI states was similar. ctEMVI is an independent prognostic risk factor and has different prognostic value in different LVI states. It is recommended to perform the evaluation in routine work, especially for patients with positive LVI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?