Abstract:Current approaches to biodiversity conservation are largely based on geographic areas, ecosystems, ecological communities, and species, with less attention on genetic diversity and the evolutionary continuum from populations to species. Conservation management generally rests on discrete categories, such as identified species, and, for threated taxa, intraspecific units. Species, in particular, provide a common measure of biodiversity yet in both theory and nature, speciation is typically a protracted process progressing from connected populations to unambiguous species with variable rates of phenotypic, ecological and genetic divergence. Thus, most recognized species are not genetically uniform and are sometimes highly structured into historically isolated populations worthy of consideration as intraspecific units that represent unique genetic diversity for conservation. Genome screens offer unprecedented resolution of structure across taxonomic boundaries in species complexes, and have the potential to oversplit species if not interpreted conservatively. This highlights the blurred line between populations and species, and can confound simple dichotomies of “species” vs. “not species.” At the same time, like plants, there is increasing evidence that even distantly related animal species can hybridize and exchange genes. A review of conservation legislation reveals that legal definitions of “species” are quite flexible and can accommodate a range of infra-specifictaxa and divergent populations, as well as taxonomically recognized species. For example, the legislative definition of a species around the world can include: species, subspecies, varieties, and geographically and/or genetically distinct populations. In principle, this flexibility allows for protection of genetic diversity and maintenance of evolutionary processes at a broad range of infra-specific levels. However, evolutionary biologists often fail to adequately justify and then translate their evidence for genetically defined units into categories suited to assessment under local legislation. We recommend that (i) genomic data should be interpreted conservatively when formally naming species, (ii) concomitantly, there should be stronger impetus and a more uniform approach to identifying clearly justified intraspecific units, (iii) guidelines be developed for recognizing and labeling intraspecific data that align with best scientific practice, and (iv) that the more nuanced view of species and speciation emerging from genomic analyses is communicated more effectively by scientists to decision makers.

The Era of Reference Genomes in Conservation Genomics

How genomics can help biodiversity conservation

New developments in the field of genomic technologies and their relevance to conservation management

Genomics and conservation: Guidance from training to analyses and applications

How Can Genomics Help or Hinder Wildlife Conservation?

Indigenous peoples and local communities as partners in the sequencing of global eukaryotic biodiversity

Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management

Toward genome assemblies for all marine vertebrates: current landscape and challenges

Beyond the Human Genome Project: The Age of Complete Human Genome Sequences and Pangenome References

Conservation and the Genomics of Populations

Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics

Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species

Quest for Orthologs in the Era of Biodiversity Genomics

Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life

The changing face of genome assemblies: Guidance on achieving high‐quality reference genomes

Scalable, accessible and reproducible reference genome assembly and evaluation in Galaxy

The Human Pangenome Project: a global resource to map genomic diversity

The future is now: Amplicon sequencing and sequence capture usher in the conservation genomics era

Genome-Wide and Trait-Specific Markers: A Perspective in Designing Conservation Programs

Genomic Diversity as a Key Conservation Criterion: Proof‐of‐Concept From Mammalian Whole‐Genome Resequencing Data

From the reference human genome to human pangenome: Premise, promise and challenge