Abstract:The incidence of spondylodiscitis has witnessed a significant increase in recent decades. Surgical intervention becomes necessary in case of bone destruction to remove infected tissue and restore spinal stability, often involving the implantation of a cage. Despite appropriate treatment, relapses occur in up to 20 percent of cases, resulting in substantial economic and social burdens. The formation of biofilm has been identified as a major contributor to relapse development. Currently, there is no consensus among German-speaking spinal surgeons or in the existing literature regarding the preferred choice of material to minimize relapse rates. Thus, the objective of this study is to investigate whether certain materials used in spinal implants exhibit varying degrees of susceptibility to bacterial attachment, thereby providing valuable insights for improving treatment outcomes.Eight cages of each PEEK, titanium-coated PEEK (Ti-PEEK), titanium (Ti), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), tantalum (Ta) and antibiotic-loaded bone cement were incubated with 20% human plasma for 24 h. Subsequently, four implants were incubated with S. aureus for 24 h or 48 h each. The biofilm was then removed by sonication and the attained solution plated for Colony Forming Units (CFU) counting. Scanning electron microscopy was used to confirm bacterial attachment. The CFUs have been compared directly and in relation to the cages surface area. The surface area of the implants was PEEK 557 mm 2 , Ti-PEEK 472 mm 2 , Ti 985 mm 2 , PEKK 594 mm 2 , Ta 706 mm 2 , bone cement 123 mm 2 . The mean CFU count per implant and per mm 2 surface area after 24 h and after 48 h was calculated. Bone cement was found to have significantly more CFUs per mm 2 surface area than the other materials tested. When comparing the CFU count per implant, bone cement was statistically significantly more prone to biofilm formation than PEEK after 48 h. There was no statistical significance between the other materials when comparing both CFU count per mm 2 surface area and CFU count per implant. The electron microscopic analysis showed the attachment of the bacteria, as well as production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as a sign for beginning biofilm formation. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement has shown statistically significantly more bacterial attachment than the other examined materials. No difference was found between the other materials regarding bacterial attachment after 24 h and 48 h. Proposed hypotheses for further studies include testing whether differences become apparent after longer incubation or with different pathogens involved in the pathogenesis of pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Vulnerability of geriatric patients to biomaterial associated infections: in vitro study of biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa on orthopedic implants

Promotion of Escherichia cob adherence to rubber slices by adsorbed fibronectin

Studies of protein adsorption on implant materials in relation to biofilm formation I. Activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on Polypropylene and High density Polyethylene in presence of serum albumin

Bioengineering Approaches to Fight against Orthopedic Biomaterials Related-Infections

Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in Clinical Isolates from Orthopaedic Implants Associated Infections

Drug-free Antibacterial Polymers for Biomedical Applications

Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion

Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on medical implants: A review

Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius on titanium implants

Biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus on various implants used for surgical treatment of destructive spondylodiscitis

Worrying Presence of Asymptomatic Bacterial Colonisation on Implanted Orthopedic Devices

Aseptic and septic prosthetic joint loosening: Impact of biomaterial wear on immune cell function, inflammation, and infection

Towards a better understanding of the effect of protein conditioning layers on microbial adhesion: A focused investigation on Fibronectin and Bovine Serum Albumin layers on SiO2 surfaces

Biomaterial‐based possibilities for managing peri‐implantitis

Environmental, Microbiological, and Immunological Features of Bacterial Biofilms Associated with Implanted Medical Devices

Ability of adhesion and biofilm formation of pathogens of periprosthetic joint infections on titanium-niobium nitride (TiNbN) ceramic coatings

In vitro efficacy of gentamicin released from collagen sponge in eradication of bacterial biofilm preformed on hydroxyapatite surface

Surface coating of orthopedic implant to enhance the osseointegration and reduction of bacterial colonization: a review

In Vitro Assessment of Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Novel Bioactive, Biodegradable Electrospun Fiber Meshes Intended to Support Tendon Rupture Repair

The Triangle of Death

Ionized jet deposition of silver nanostructured coatings: Assessment of chemico-physical and biological behavior for application in orthopedics