Abstract:Background Pulse wave analysis using the SphygmoCor system allows the estimation of central blood pressures (BP). However, there is controversy over its accuracy for clinical use. Methods In 45 patients undergoing coronary angiography, we compared the ascending aorta BPs measured by the invasive catheter with the estimations by the SphygmoCor system, using paired t-tests, simple correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plots. Results The estimation of central systolic BP by SphygmoCor was lower, although statistically insignificant, than that measured by the catheter (144 ± 29 vs. 148 ± 30 mm Hg; P = 0.98). The SD of the difference amounted to 17 mm Hg. Both measured and estimated central systolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than the brachial systolic BP (156 ± 30 mm Hg). The diastolic BP measured at the brachial artery (87 ± 15 mm Hg) and provided by SphygmoCor (90 ± 15 mm Hg) were systematically higher (P < 0.001) than that measured by the catheter (74 ± 13 mm Hg). The SphygmoCor system underestimated the central pulse pressure by − 20 ± 14 mm Hg compared to the catheter method. The correlation coefficients for systolic BP, diastolic BP and pulse pressure between catheter measurements and the SphygmoCor estimations were 0.84, 0.60 and 0.82 (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions When the radial waveform was calibrated with the oscillometric brachial pressures, the SphygmoCor system could not provide accurate estimation of central BPs. The inaccurate measurement of cuff pressure was the major limiting factor for the use of the transfer function in the clinical settings. Background Pulse wave analysis using the SphygmoCor system allows the estimation of central blood pressures (BP). However, there is controversy over its accuracy for clinical use. Methods In 45 patients undergoing coronary angiography, we compared the ascending aorta BPs measured by the invasive catheter with the estimations by the SphygmoCor system, using paired t-tests, simple correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plots. Results The estimation of central systolic BP by SphygmoCor was lower, although statistically insignificant, than that measured by the catheter (144 ± 29 vs. 148 ± 30 mm Hg; P = 0.98). The SD of the difference amounted to 17 mm Hg. Both measured and estimated central systolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than the brachial systolic BP (156 ± 30 mm Hg). The diastolic BP measured at the brachial artery (87 ± 15 mm Hg) and provided by SphygmoCor (90 ± 15 mm Hg) were systematically higher (P < 0.001) than that measured by the catheter (74 ± 13 mm Hg). The SphygmoCor system underestimated the central pulse pressure by − 20 ± 14 mm Hg compared to the catheter method. The correlation coefficients for systolic BP, diastolic BP and pulse pressure between catheter measurements and the SphygmoCor estimations were 0.84, 0.60 and 0.82 (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions When the radial waveform was calibrated with the oscillometric brachial pressures, the SphygmoCor system could not provide accurate estimation of central BPs. The inaccurate measurement of cuff pressure was the major limiting factor for the use of the transfer function in the clinical settings.

Why is a Rule-based Shock Early Warning System Not Accurate - a Case Study.

A Concise Drug Alerting Rule Set for Chinese Hospitals and Its Application in Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)

Effectiveness of Automated Alerting System Compared to Usual Care for the Management of Sepsis

Development and Validation of an Early Warning System for Septic Shock in Intensive Care Unit

The protocol for diagnosis and treatment of shock in county hospital

Risk prediction using the National Early Warning Score and the Worthing Physiological Scoring System in patients who were transported to the Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Department: A cohort study

Extensive Variability in Vasoactive Agent Therapy

Associations Between Elevated Systolic Blood Pressure and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Propensity Analysis

Blood pressure response index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a multicenter cohort study

Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults

Predicting septic shock in patients with sepsis at emergency department triage level using systolic and diastolic shock index

Parsimonious waveform-derived features consisting of pulse arrival time and heart rate variability predicts the onset of septic shock

Forewarning of hypotensive events using a Bayesian artificial neural network in neurocritical care

Hypotension During Vasopressor Infusion Occurs in Predictable Clusters: A Multicenter Analysis

Physiology-Informed Real-Time Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Learning and Prediction for Septic Patients Receiving Norepinephrine

DEVELOPMENT OF SCORE SYSTEM BASED ON POINT-OF-CARE ULTRASOUND TO PREDICT VASOPRESSOR REQUIREMENT FOR EMERGENCY PATIENTS WITH CARDIOPULMONARY SYMPTOMS

Validation of the Central Blood Pressure Estimation by the SphygmoCor System in Chinese

Accuracy and Performance of Triage Blood Pressure Measurements in A Real-World Clinic Setting

Evaluation of an automated surveillance system using trigger alerts to prevent adverse drug events in the intensive care unit and general ward

Mean arterial pressure and mortality in patients with distributive shock: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-III database

Abstract P-192