Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Pediatric Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis with Thymic Involvement

Ja-Feng Yao,Dong Wang,Hong-Hao Ma,Hong-Yun Lian,Li Zhang,Tian-You Wang,Zhi-Gang Li,Jin Jiang,Lei Cui,Rui Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.01.007
IF: 6.314
2022-01-01
The Journal of Pediatrics
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) with thymic involvement. Study design We retrospectively described the clinical, biological, and imaging characteristics of a series of 19 patients with pediatric LCH with thymic involvement in our center between September 2016 and December 2019. We further analyzed the treatment response and outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Results Thymic involvement was found in 4.4% of a 433-consecutive pediatric LCH cohort; all LCH-thymic involvement presented with multisystem disease. Patients with thymic involvement were typically younger, harboring more lung and thyroid involvement and less bone involvement than those without thymic involvement. Most patients with thymic involvement had alteration of immunocompetence with decreased numbers of T-lymphocyte subsets and immunoglobulin G levels. Overall, 47.1 % of patients demonstrated a response after 6 weeks of induction therapy, and 92.3% of the patients who did not respond to the first-line treatment had resolution of thymus after the second-line and/or targeted therapy. The progression/relapse rate showed no difference between patients who shifted to second-line therapy and those to dabrafenib (33.3% vs 25%, P = 1.000). The survival for patients with thymic involvement did not differ from those without thymic involvement. More patients treated with second-line chemotherapy had severe adverse events than those given dabrafenib (88.9% vs 0, P < .001). Conclusions Thymic involvement was observed rarely in LCH and had specific clinical characteristics. Chemotherapy could resolve most thymic lesions, and BRAF inhibitors might provide a promising treatment option with less toxicity for infants with BRAF-V600E mutation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?