Abstract:Grain length (size) and weight are essential components of crop yield. To date, many QTLs/genes for these traits have been identified. GS3 encodes a putative transmembrane protein and functions as a negative regulator, and its larger-grain allele contains a nonsense mutation causing a 178-aa truncation (Fan et al., 2006Fan C. Xing Y. Mao H. Lu T. Han B. Xu C. Li X. Zhang Q. GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein.Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006; 112: 1164-1171Crossref PubMed Scopus (1037) Google Scholar). GL3.1/qGL3 encodes a putative protein phosphatase and also acts as a negative regulator of grain size (Qi et al., 2012Qi P. Lin Y.S. Song X.J. Shen J.B. Huang W. Shan J.X. Zhu M.Z. Jiang L.W. Gao J.P. Lin H.X. The novel quantitative trait locus GL3.1 controls rice grain size and yield by regulating cyclin-T1;3.Cell Res. 2012; 22: 1666-1680Crossref PubMed Scopus (300) Google Scholar, Zhang et al., 2012Zhang X.J. Wang J.F. Huang J. Lan H.X. Wang C.L. Yin C.F. Wu Y.Y. Tang H.J. Qian Q. Li J.Y. et al.Rare allele of OsPPKL1 associated with grain length causes extra-large grain and a significant yield increase in rice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109: 21534-21539Crossref PubMed Scopus (353) Google Scholar). Another negative regulator of grain size and weight is TGW6, which hydrolyzes indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-glucose into IAA and glucose (Ishimaru et al., 2013Ishimaru K. Hirotsu N. Madoka Y. Murakami N. Hara N. Onodera H. Kashiwagi T. Ujiie K. Shimizu B. Onishi A. et al.Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGW6 enhances rice grain weight and increases yield.Nat. Genet. 2013; 45: 707-711Crossref PubMed Scopus (415) Google Scholar). In contrast, GW6a is a positive regulator of grain weight, which encodes a novel histone H4 acetyltransferase (Song et al., 2015Song X.J. Kuroha T. Ayano M. Furuta T. Nagai K. Komeda N. Segami S. Miura K. Ogawa D. Kamura T. et al.Rare allele of a previously unidentified histone H4 acetyltransferase enhances grain weight, yield, and plant biomass in rice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015; 112: 76-81Crossref PubMed Scopus (193) Google Scholar). Copy number variation at the GL7/GW7 locus causes elevated expression of GL7 and thus an increase in grain length (Wang et al., 2015aWang S. Li S. Liu Q. Wu K. Zhang J. Wang S. Wang Y. Chen X. Zhang Y. Gao C. et al.The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality.Nat. Genet. 2015; 47: 949-954Crossref PubMed Scopus (419) Google Scholar, Wang et al., 2015bWang Y. Xiong G. Hu J. Jiang L. Yu H. Xu J. Fang Y. Zeng L. Xu E. Xu J. et al.Copy number variation at the GL7 locus contributes to grain size diversity in rice.Nat. Genet. 2015; 47: 944-948Crossref PubMed Scopus (395) Google Scholar). GL2/GS2 encodes the plant-specific transcription factor OsGRF4, and its larger-grain allele harbors a mutation preventing cleavage by miR396c, resulting in elevated GL2/GS2 expression (Hu et al., 2015Hu J. Wang Y. Fang Y. Zeng L. Xu J. Yu H. Shi Z. Pan J. Zhang D. Kang S. et al.A rare allele of GS2 enhances grain size and grain yield in rice.Mol. Plant. 2015; 8: 1455-1465Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (311) Google Scholar, Che et al., 2016Che R. Tong H. Shi B. Liu Y. Fang S. Liu D. Xiao Y. Hu B. Liu L. Wang H. et al.Control of grain size and rice yield by GL2-mediated brassinosteroid responses.Nat. Plants. 2016; 2: 15195-15201Crossref Scopus (276) Google Scholar). GLW7 encodes the plant-specific transcription factor OsSPL13, and high OsSPL13 expression is associated with larger grains (Si et al., 2016Si L. Chen J. Huang X. Gong H. Luo J. Hou Q. Zhou T. Lu T. Zhu J. Shangguan Y. et al.OsSPL13 controls grain size in cultivated rice.Nat. Genet. 2016; 48: 447-456Crossref PubMed Scopus (452) Google Scholar). These findings have greatly enhanced our understanding of grain length and weight regulation; however, there are still gaps in integrating these factors into genetic network(s). Here, we report a thorough dissection of the QTL composition of grain size and the characterization of a novel QTL, qTGW3, that regulates grain length and weight in rice. In a previous study, to understand how super-large rice grains in the JZ1560 cultivar form, we performed QTL analyses and identified a single grain-length QTL on chromosome 6 (Ying et al., 2012Ying J.Z. Gao J.P. Shan J.X. Zhu M.Z. Shi M. Lin H.X. Dissecting the genetic basis of extremely large grain shape in rice cultivar ‘JZ1560’.J. Genet. Genomics. 2012; 39: 325-333Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar). We assumed that there were also undetected major QTL(s) shaping grain size. We then produced an F7 RIL population derived from JZ1560 and the small-grain cultivar Huanghuazhan (HHZ) (Figure 1A). As expected, phenotypic variation in almost all investigated traits approximated a normal distribution, and we observed transgressive segregation for grain length (GL) and grain yield per plant (GY) (Supplemental Figure 1). We thus considered this population to be suitable for QTL mapping and inferred that novel QTL(s) or a combination of different loci contributed to the transgressive GL and GY phenotypes. We utilized SLAF-seq technology for genotyping the RIL population, and ultimately obtained 18 194 efficient SLAFs to construct a genetic map (Supplemental Figure 2). Using this map and the GL, grain width (GW), thousand grain weight (TGW), and GY phenotypes measured in either 2015 or 2016, we mapped more than 40 QTLs, including the known loci GW2 and qSW5/GW5 (Ying et al., 2012Ying J.Z. Gao J.P. Shan J.X. Zhu M.Z. Shi M. Lin H.X. Dissecting the genetic basis of extremely large grain shape in rice cultivar ‘JZ1560’.J. Genet. Genomics. 2012; 39: 325-333Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar). Most of the mapped GL, GW, and TGW QTLs (91%, i.e., 29 of 32) were detected repeatedly; however, only approximately 42% of the GY QTLs were detected more than once (Supplemental Figure 3 and Supplemental Table 1). To confirm these results, we performed PCR genotyping and QTL analysis and observed that most of the mapped QTLs, especially those with relatively larger effects, could be reproduced (Supplemental Figure 4). Thus, we have obtained a deeper understanding of the genetic architecture of the super-large grain accession JZ1560 and identified novel major QTLs, such as qGL1-1, qGL3/qTGW3-2 (here named qTGW3) (see below) for grain size, weight, and yield. We next scrutinized the qTGW3 locus (Supplemental Figure 5A and 5B). We screened residual heterozygous lines (RHLs) that are heterozygous for qTGW3 GL segregation in the RHL populations was consistent with single-gene regulation (Supplemental Figure 5C). We then bred a nearly isogenic line, NIL(TGW3), containing an introgression segment from JZ1560 between markers JD3014 and JD3015. Compared with the HHZ isogenic control, we observed a considerable increase in GL (7.6%) but a relatively smaller increase in GT (4.2%) and GW (1.1%) in NIL(TGW3) (Supplemental Figure 6A–6C); We also observed a significant increase (8.5%) in TGW (Supplemental Figure 6D). We thus concluded that the enhanced TGW in NIL(TGW3) was primarily due to an increase in GL. We further compared the grain yields of NIL(TGW3) with the control plants and observed over 10% higher GY in NIL(TGW3) (Supplemental Figure 6E). We also examined whether TGW3 has pleiotropic effects. The control and NIL(TGW3) plants did not differ in appearance and had indistinguishable panicle numbers (Supplemental Figure 6F), but NIL(TGW3) plants were slightly taller (p < 0.05). In addition, both total grain number per plant and empty grain number per plant were lower in NIL(TGW3) than in the control, but filled grain number per plant did not differ. More interestingly, the seed setting rate of NIL(TGW3) was significantly higher than that of the control (p < 0.01) (Supplemental Figure 7). These results suggest that TGW3 affects other traits beyond its profound impact on grain size. Detailed analysis of RHLs for qTGW3 enabled us to map the target gene to an interval between JD3014 and JD3015, where a total of 54 recombinants were obtained (Figure 1B and 1C). Finally, we localized qTGW3 to a region of 18.7 kb (Figure 1D), in which we identified three predicted ORFs as viable candidates for qTGW3. One of these ORFs, LOC_Os03g62500 encodes a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase. A previous study revealed that the rice GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase GSK2 plays an important role in grain size regulation (Tong et al., 2012Tong H. Liu L. Jin Y. Du L. Yin Y. Qian Q. Zhu L. Chu C. DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING acts as a direct downstream target of a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase to mediate Brassinosteroid responses in rice.Plant Cell. 2012; 24: 2562-2577Crossref PubMed Scopus (233) Google Scholar). Sequence analysis showed that, compared with the HHZ (small-grain) allele of LOC_Os03g62500, the JZ1560 allele was missing both exons 3 and 4, which encode an ATP binding site (ABS) domain (Figure 1E), suggesting that the large-grain allele could be, at least partially, functionally incapacitated. To test this hypothesis, we produced transgenic rice plants with altered LOC_Os03g62500 gene expression; enhanced expression of the LOC_Os03g62500 HHZ allele driven by the 35S promoter reduced GL (Figure 1F, Supplemental Figure 8A and 8B), while downregulation of endogenous gene expression resulted in enlarged grains (Figure 1G, Supplemental Figure 8C and 8D). In addition, mutation of the LOC_Os03g62500 gene by CRISPR/Cas9 also caused enlarged grains (Figure 1H, Supplemental Figure 8E). Based on these results, we conclude that LOC_Os03g62500 is the causal gene underlying the TGW3. To reveal the molecular basis for TGW3 regulation of grain size we examined its temporal and spatial expression profile using real-time PCR. TGW3 was preferentially expressed in young panicles, which is consistent with its biological function (Supplemental Figure 9A). We also analyzed the subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged TGW3 in transiently transformed tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaf epidermal cells, and found that the fusion protein localized to the nucleus and the cytoplasm (Supplemental Figure 9B). We found two nucleotide substitutions in the cDNA sequence of the JZ1560 allele (TGW3JZ) that did not cause any amino acid changes and a 333-bp deletion (equivalent to 111 amino acid residues) that corresponds to both exons 3 and 4 in the TGW3 HHZ allele (TGW3HHZ) (Figure 1E, Supplemental Figures 10 and 11A). Subsequent SWISS-MODEL database analysis indicated that the deletion resulted in the complete loss of the ABS domain and severe damage to the dimer interface domain (Supplemental Figure 11B), suggesting that the TGW3HHZ protein could form a dimerization structure, but TGW3JZ could not (Supplemental Figure 11C). We tested this hypothesis using yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) experiments and found that TGW3HHZ could interact with itself in yeast cells, but TGW3JZ could not (Supplemental Figure 11D). We also tested our prediction that altered nucleotides in the 3rd intron of the TGW3JZ allele was responsible for its distinct RNA splicing pattern. Indeed, Agrobacterium-mediated transient assays in N. benthamiana revealed that a fragment containing the first four exons and three introns of the TGW3JZ allele caused retention of the 3rd intron (Supplemental Figure 12); we inferred that intron retention would result in the complete loss of exons 3 and 4. We next sought to uncover the cytological basis underlying the regulation of grain size by TGW3, and compared the center part of the spikelet hull (lemma) at maturity in NIL(TGW3) and the corresponding control using scanning electron microscopy (Figure 1J). The spikelet hull cells of NIL(TGW3) were larger in size (by 10.1%) and significantly longer (10.6%, in the grain-length orientation) than those of the control, although the cell width did not differ; however, the estimated total cell number was significantly lower in NIL(TGW3) (Figure 1K and 1L). We also inspected the cytological features in grains of transgenic rice with altered TGW3 expression. Consistent with the above results, the sizes and lengths of cells in spikelet hulls of lines with downregulated and/or CRISPR-Cas9-edited TGW3 expression were significantly higher, while those of lines overexpressing TGW3 were clearly lower compared with the control (Supplemental Figure 13A and 13B). Furthermore, the estimated total cell number of grains from lines with reduced expression or with edited TGW3 was significantly lower than that of the control, yet the cell number of plants overexpressing TGW3 did not differ (Supplemental Figure 13C). Collectively, these results suggest that TGW3 has contrasting effects on cell size and cell number, suggesting that it regulates grain size through coordinated alteration of cell expansion and cell division. To investigate whether TGW3 is a domestication-associated gene, we analyzed the genomic sequences of 1083 O. sativa and 446 O. rufipogon accessions. However, we did not detect any domestication signals in the 100 kb region surrounding the TGW3 locus (Supplemental Figure 14A). We also analyzed the coding sequences of TGW3 from Sancunli (SCL) and Changxiangdao (CXD), two other rice varieties that have longer grains, and found these sequences were almost identical to the JZ1560 allele (Supplemental Figure 14B). These observations suggest that TGW3 might not be a domestication gene and that its large-grain allele is rare. In summary, in this study, through in-depth dissection of the QTLs for grain size we identified more than 40 QTLs for grain size and yield. Importantly, most of them have not yet been cloned. We cloned a major QTL, qTGW3, and found that it encodes a negative regulator of grain length and weight and coordinately alters cell size and cell number in the spikelet hull. Our findings thus provide new insights into the genetic architecture of a super-large rice grain accession and uncover a novel mechanism for grain size regulation. This work was supported by grants from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA08020108-3), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91435113, 31371605), National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Project, 2014CB943404) and Chinese High-yielding Transgenic Program (2016ZX08001-004).

Abstract:Plant Biotechnology JournalVolume 18, Issue 6 p. 1345-1347 Brief CommunicationOpen Access Maize ZmRPH1 encodes a microtubule-associated protein that controls plant and ear height Wei Li, Wei Li orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-2044 State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorFanghui Ge, Fanghui Ge State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhiquan Qiang, Zhiquan Qiang State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLei Zhu, Lei Zhu State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorShuaisong Zhang, Shuaisong Zhang State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLimei Chen, Limei Chen State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiqing Wang, Corresponding Author Xiqing Wang wangxq21@cau.edu.cn State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China Correspondence (Tel +86-10-62733599; fax +86-10-62733599; email wangxq21@cau.edu.cn (XW); Tel +86-10-62732422; fax +86-10-62732422; email lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn (JL); Tel +86-10-62734395; fax +86-10-62734395; email yingfu@cau.edu.cn (YF))Search for more papers by this authorJiansheng Li, Corresponding Author Jiansheng Li lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn National Maize Improvement Centre of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China Correspondence (Tel +86-10-62733599; fax +86-10-62733599; email wangxq21@cau.edu.cn (XW); Tel +86-10-62732422; fax +86-10-62732422; email lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn (JL); Tel +86-10-62734395; fax +86-10-62734395; email yingfu@cau.edu.cn (YF))Search for more papers by this authorYing Fu, Corresponding Author Ying Fu yingfu@cau.edu.cn State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China Correspondence (Tel +86-10-62733599; fax +86-10-62733599; email wangxq21@cau.edu.cn (XW); Tel +86-10-62732422; fax +86-10-62732422; email lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn (JL); Tel +86-10-62734395; fax +86-10-62734395; email yingfu@cau.edu.cn (YF))Search for more papers by this author Wei Li, Wei Li orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-2044 State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorFanghui Ge, Fanghui Ge State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhiquan Qiang, Zhiquan Qiang State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLei Zhu, Lei Zhu State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorShuaisong Zhang, Shuaisong Zhang State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLimei Chen, Limei Chen State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiqing Wang, Corresponding Author Xiqing Wang wangxq21@cau.edu.cn State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China Correspondence (Tel +86-10-62733599; fax +86-10-62733599; email wangxq21@cau.edu.cn (XW); Tel +86-10-62732422; fax +86-10-62732422; email lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn (JL); Tel +86-10-62734395; fax +86-10-62734395; email yingfu@cau.edu.cn (YF))Search for more papers by this authorJiansheng Li, Corresponding Author Jiansheng Li lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn National Maize Improvement Centre of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China Correspondence (Tel +86-10-62733599; fax +86-10-62733599; email wangxq21@cau.edu.cn (XW); Tel +86-10-62732422; fax +86-10-62732422; email lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn (JL); Tel +86-10-62734395; fax +86-10-62734395; email yingfu@cau.edu.cn (YF))Search for more papers by this authorYing Fu, Corresponding Author Ying Fu yingfu@cau.edu.cn State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China Correspondence (Tel +86-10-62733599; fax +86-10-62733599; email wangxq21@cau.edu.cn (XW); Tel +86-10-62732422; fax +86-10-62732422; email lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn (JL); Tel +86-10-62734395; fax +86-10-62734395; email yingfu@cau.edu.cn (YF))Search for more papers by this author First published: 06 November 2019 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13292Citations: 7AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat In grass crops, short stature is an ideal agronomic trait since it allows for better resistance to lodging and higher planting density. Dwarf and semi-dwarf mutants have been widely used in rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) breeding, and the related 'Green Revolution' genes, such as sd1 in rice and Rht in wheat, are usually involved in the gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis or signalling (Peng et al., 1999; Sasaki et al., 2002). However, many GA biosynthesis/signalling deficient maize (Zea mays) mutants have pleiotropic phenotypes that are detrimental to yields (Chen et al., 2014; Fujioka et al., 1988; Lawit et al., 2010; Winkler and Helentjaris, 1995), therefore, are not applicable to maize breeding. Considering that maize plant height largely results from stem elongation driven by cell division and cell expansion within the internodes, identifying new regulators that directly regulate cell elongation may be a solution. The microtubule plays an essential role in guiding plant cell polar growth, which is dependent on its organization and dynamics and regulated by a suite of diverse microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) (Chen et al., 2016). However, MAPs in maize are largely unknown. Recently, several proteins of Arabidopsis QWRF family were identified as MAPs (Lee et al., 2017; Pignocchi et al., 2009). By searching the Gramene database, we revealed a gene with ID Zm00001d028073 that encoded a QWRF homolog protein in maize. We cloned the CDS of this gene into an overexpression vector, pBCXUN, driven by the maize UBI promoter, and introduced it into the maize inbred line B73-329 using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The resulting overexpressed lines (OE2 and OE4) had significantly shorter and wider mesocotyls (Figure 1a–c) with parenchyma cells showing reduced length but increased width compared to B73-329 (Figure 1d–f). We renamed this gene ZmRPH1 (Reducing Plant Height 1). Furthermore, ZmRPH1 overexpression also led to shorter roots with reduced cell length in maize seedlings (Figure 1g,h). These data suggest a general role for ZmRPH1 in the control of polar cell growth in maize. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint ZmRPH1 is a maize MAP that regulates plant and ear height. (a)¶ ZmRPH1 expression levels analysed by RT-qPCR in different maize lines. Internal reference: Actin1. (b)¶ Average length and (c)¶ width of 7-day-old etiolated maize mesocotyls. n ≥ 10. (d) Longitudinal sections of 7-day-old etiolated mesocotyls. Bar = 100 µm. (e)¶ Average length and (f)¶ width of mesocotyl cells shown in (d). n ≥ 200 cells from 10 seedlings. (g)¶ Average primary root length of 3-day-old dark-grown maize seedlings. n ≥ 10. (h)¶ Average length of root epidermal cells in the elongation zone of different seedlings. n ≥ 200 cells from five seedlings. (i) Biotinylated-lysine-labelled ZmRPH1 but not GFP (control) cosedimented with prepolymerized microtubules in vitro. (j) ZmRPH1-GFP colocalized with mCherry-tubulin-labelled microtubules in maize leaf protoplasts. Bar = 7 µm. (k) Cortical microtubules in root epidermal cells at the elongation zone from different 2-day-old dark-grown maize seedlings. Bar = 5 µm. (l) Percentage of cells with a different microtubule orientation as shown in (k). n ≥ 200 cells from five seedlings. (m) GFP-MBD-labelled cortical microtubules in the hypocotyl epidermal cells of 3-day-old etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings. Lower panel: ZmRPH1 transcripts in Col-0, OX1 and OX2 seedlings analysed by RT-PCR. Bar = 10 µm. (n) Percentage of cells with different microtubule orientation shown in (m). n ≥ 100 cells from 20 seedlings. (o) B73-329 and OEs plants grown in a greenhouse for 8 weeks. Bar = 1 m. (p)¶ Average plant height of plants shown in (o). (n = 20). (q)¶ Average length of the sixth internode from plants shown in (o). (n = 5). (r)¶ Average length of epidermal and (s)¶ parenchyma cells in the middle of the sixth internode. n ≥ 200 cells from 10 plants. (t) B73-329 and OEs plants grown in the field for 3 months. Bar = 1 m. (u)¶Ɨ Table of plant and ear height and average internode length collected from inbred and hybrid plants grown in the field. One plot = 42 plants; n = 3 replicate plots. (v)¶§Ɨ Lodging rate of hybrid plants (milk ripening stage) grown under different densities. (w)¶Ɨ Table of flowering times (days) of inbred and hybrid plants. One plot = 42 plants; n = 3 replicate plots. (x)¶§Ɨ Table of ear weight and grain yield per plot of hybrid plants grown at different densities. ¶Data are shown as the means ± SD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, t-test. §One plot of different densities (60 000/90 000/120 000 plants/ha) = 42/63/84 plants. n = 3 replicate plots. ƗInbred plants: year 2015/2016, Gongzhuling; Hybrid plants (CK: T13/B73-329, #OE: T13/OE): year 2016/2017, Zhuozhou. To test whether ZmRPH1 is a novel MAP just like its Arabidopsis homologs, we performed an in vitro microtubule cosedimentation assay. We adopted the TNT quick coupled transcription/translation system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to express the ZmRPH1 protein. Biotinylated-lysine-labelled ZmPRH1 protein cosedimented with prepolymerized microtubules in the pellet after a high-speed centrifugation, indicating its direct association with microtubules in vitro (Figure 1i). We then fused ZmRPH1 to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and transiently expressed it into maize protoplasts. We observed filament-like structures that colocalized with mCherry-tubulin-labelled microtubules (Figure 1j). Thus, we conclude that ZmRPH1 is an MAP in maize. Next, we investigated the function of ZmRPH1 in microtubules. It is well established that in fast elongating cells cortical microtubules organize into a transverse parallel array to guide microfibril deposition in the cell wall. When cell growth slows or ceases, cortical microtubules reorganize into randomly or longitudinally oriented arrays (Hamada, 2014). We surveyed root epidermal cells in the elongation zone, within which the microtubules were easily visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy using an anti-α-tubulin antibody. In 2-day-old seedlings, we observed transversely oriented microtubules in 93% of the B73-329 root epidermal cells, while <10% of OE2 or OE4 cells had transverse microtubules. By contrast, in most OE2 or OE4 cells microtubules were obliquely or randomly oriented (Figure 1k,l). We further overexpressed ZmRPH1 in Arabidopsis, and the resulting overexpressing lines (OX1 and OX2) had shorter etiolated hypocotyls compared with the control. By crossing OX1 and OX2 with a transgenic line expressing GFP-MBD, we observed GFP-MBD-labelled microtubules in live cells. We found that ZmRPH1 overexpression significantly reduced the frequency of cells with transverse microtubules in OX1 and OX2 hypocotyls (approximately 30%) compared to the control (>60%; Figure 1m,n). Overall, the above results indicated that ZmRPH1 modulates cell elongation by regulating the cortical microtubule orientation. We then measured plant height and the length of the sixth internode in maize plants grown in a greenhouse. The ZmRPH1 overexpressing lines (OE2 and OE4) all resulted in shorter plant heights and reduced internode lengths (Figure 1o–q). Reduced internode epidermal and parenchyma cell lengths were also revealed in OE2 and OE4 compared with the control, B73-329 (Figure 1r,s), indicating that ZmRPH1 overexpression reduced internode cell elongation and affected maize plant height. However, it remains an interesting question whether ZmRPH1, as a MAP, can also regulate mitotic microtubule organization and affect cell division. Next, we evaluated various growth-related traits of OE2 and OE4 plants in field trials at multiple sites across different years. In addition to the ZmRPH1 OE inbred lines, we also used the T13 inbred line as the female tester to make hybrids with OE2 and OE4, and the resulting hybrid lines were named #OEs. We found that both plant and ear heights were significantly reduced in all tested ZmRPH1 overexpressing inbred and hybrid lines compared with corresponding controls (Figure 1t,u). Additionally, the number of internodes did not differ between transgenic lines and controls. However, average internode lengths were significantly shorter in ZmRPH1 overexpressing plants (Figure 1u). Moreover, the lodging rate of lines #OE2 and #OE4 was significantly lower compared with the control (Figure 1v). Thus, ZmRPH1 overexpression reduced plant and ear height and enhanced the lodging resistance of plants, which could be a primary precondition for efforts to achieve higher yielding maize. Plant height is highly related to maize yield. Therefore, we explored whether ZmRPH1 overexpression would affect maize yield and found that ZmRPH1 overexpression had no obvious impact on flowering time and fertility (Figure 1w). We then measured the ear weight per plant and grain yield per hybrid line plot in different years and found no significant difference between ZmRPH1 overexpression lines and the control in most cases (Figure 1x). In summary, we identified ZmRPH1 as a novel MAP that regulates cell elongation in maize. We demonstrated that ZmRPH1 overexpression lowered plant and ear heights by reducing the length of all internodes and increased lodging resistance, without significantly reducing maize yield. This study also proved that modulation of microtubules to control cell elongation may be a potential strategy in breeding cultivars for compact planting, and genes for MAPs in maize including ZmRPH1 could serve as new plant height genes with practical potential in creating maize of ideal plant type. Acknowledgements We thank Professors Ming Yuan, Feng Qin, and Jinsheng Lai (CAU) for helpful discussion. The maize overexpression lines were created by the Maize Functional Genomic Project of CAU. This work was supported by NSFC 91735305 and 91854119 to YF; MOA, PRC 2019ZX08010003-002-005 to XW. Author contributions W.L., J-S. L., X-Q. W., and Y.F. contributed to project design. W.L., F-H. G., Z-Q. Q., L.Z., S-S. Z., and L-M. C. performed the experiments and data analysis. W.L. and Y.F. wrote the manuscript. Y.F., J-S.L. and X-Q.W. revised the article. Conflict of interest No conflict of interests to declare. References Chen, Y., Hou, M., Liu, L., Wu, S., Shen, Y., Ishiyama, K., Kobayashi, M. et al. (2014) The maize DWARF1 encodes a gibberellin 3-oxidase and is dual localized to the nucleus and cytosol. Plant Physiol. 166, 2028– 2039. Chen, X., Wu, S., Liu, Z. and Friml, J. (2016) Environmental and endogenous control of cortical microtubule orientation. Trends Cell biol. 26, 409– 419. Fujioka, S., Yamane, H., Spray, C.R., Katsumi, M., Phinney, B., Gaskin, P., Macmillan, J. et al. (1988) The dominant non-gibberellin-responding dwarf mutant (D8) of maize accumulates native gibberellins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 9031– 9035. Hamada, T. (2014) Microtubule organization and microtubule-associated proteins in plant cells. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 312, 1– 52. Lawit, S.J., Wych, H.M., Xu, D., Kundu, S. and Tomes, D.T. (2010) Maize DELLA proteins dwarf plant8 and dwarf plant9 as modulators of plant development. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 1854– 1868. Lee, Y.J., Hiwatashi, Y., Hotta, T., Xie, T., Doonan, J.H. and Liu, B. (2017) The mitotic function of augmin is dependent on its microtubule-associated protein subunit EDE1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 27(24), 3891– 3897.e4. Peng, J.R., Richards, D.E., Hartley, N.M., Murphy, G.P., Devos, K.M., Flintham, J.E., James, B. et al. (1999) 'Green revolution' genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 400, 256– 261. Pignocchi, C., Minns, G.E., Nesi, N., Koumproglou, R., Kitsios, G., Benning, C., Lloyd, C.W. et al. (2009) ENDOSPERM DEFECTIVE1 is a novel microtubule-associated protein essential for seed development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 21, 90– 105. Sasaki, A., Ashikari, M., Ueguchi-Tanaka, M., Itoh, H., Nishimura, A., Swapan, D., Ishiyama, K. et al. (2002) A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416, 701– 702. Winkler, R.G. and Helentjaris, T. (1995) The maize Dwarf3 gene encodes a cytochrome P450-mediated early step in Gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 7, 1307– 1317. Citing Literature Volume18, Issue6June 2020Pages 1345-1347 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation

Cloning and Functional Characterization of Rht8, a "green Revolution" Replacement Gene in Wheat.

Dominant and Pleiotropic Effects of A Gai Gene in Wheat Results from A Lack of Interaction Between Della and Gid1

Phenotypic Analysis and Gene Cloning of a Dwarf Mutant Htr in Rice

Activation of Gibberellin 2-Oxidase 6 Decreases Active Gibberellin Levels and Creates a Dominant Semi-Dwarf Phenotype in Rice (oryza Sativa L.).

Cloning and Expression of Gene Responsible for High-Tillering Dwarf Phenotype in Indica Rice Mutant Gsor23

DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously.

Genetic and physiological analysis of Rht8 in bread wheat: an alternative source of semi-dwarfism with a reduced sensitivity to brassinosteroids

Genetic Mapping and Identification of Rht8-B1 That Regulates Plant Height in Wheat

A wheat dominant dwarfing line with Rht12, which reduces stem cell length and affects gibberellic acid synthesis, is a 5AL terminal deletion line

Dwarfing Gene Rht18 from Tetraploid Wheat Responds to Exogenous GA3 in Hexaploid Wheat

Isolation of a Gibberellin-Insensitive Dwarfing Gene, Rht - B1e , and Development of an Allele-Specific PCR Marker

The Fine Mapping of Dwarf Gene Rht5 in Bread Wheat and Its Effects on Plant Height and Main Agronomic Traits.

Comparing the Effects of GA-responsive Dwarfing Genes Rht13 and Rht8 on Plant Height and Some Agronomic Traits in Common Wheat

Fine mapping of a reduced height gene Rht22 in Jianyangailanmai (Ttiticum turgidum L., 2n=4x=28, AABB)

Molecular Mapping Of Reduced Plant Height Gene Rht24 In Bread Wheat

A natural variation in Ribonuclease H-like gene underlies Rht8 to confer “Green Revolution” trait in wheat

TGW3, a Major QTL That Negatively Modulates Grain Length and Weight in Rice.

Identification and characterization of Rht25, a locus on chromosome arm 6AS affecting wheat plant height, heading time, and spike development

Fine Mapping of the Reduced Height Gene Rht22 in Tetraploid Wheat Landrace Jianyangailanmai (triticum Turgidum L.).

Maize ZmRPH1 Encodes a Microtubule‐associated Protein That Controls Plant and Ear Height

Genotyping of Wheat Dominant Dwarfing Gene (Rht3) in Dwarfing Mutants with Ideal Plant Height