Experimental comparison of cooling power and thermos-physiological performance of two hybrid cooling clothing: Thermoelectric and PCM-fans ventilated garments

Xue Chen,Zhaohua Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111276

IF: 7.093

2024-04-01

Building and Environment

Abstract:To compare the effects of thermoelectric cooling and ventilation clothing (TCVC) and traditional hybrid cooling clothing (PCM-Fans cooling, HCC) on human thermal physiology, cooling power, and cognitive abilities in high-temperature environments, both human thermo-physiological and thermal manikin tests were carried out. The physiological parameters (heart rate, ear temperature, skin temperature), subjective questionnaires (overall thermal sensation, thermal comfort, wet sensation), and cognitive ability evaluation of 12 subjects were collected. The thermal manikin was used to quantify the cooling efficiency and the building energy reduction of TCVC. As a result, it was found that the mean skin temperature of TCVC and HCC was reduced by 1.6 °C and 1.1 °C compared to no cooling (CON), and the sweat evaporation rate was 57.98% and 54.6%, respectively. Compared with HCC, TCVC is consistently rated with the lowest thermal sensation, lowest wet sensation, and highest thermal comfort. Moreover, TCVC demonstrates superior performance in continuous cooling effect and humidity regulation performance, making it suitable for long-term cooling requirements(≥2h) compared with HCC. In addition, TCVC provided a cooling power of 80.88W/kg, which was 1.8 times higher than HCC (45.38W/kg), indicating that TCVC had a superior cooling efficiency. We found that using TCVC can increase the HVAC temperature set point by 5 °C and save about 20∼55% of building energy. This study supports the use of cooling technology and guides users to select appropriate cooling garments for different scenarios.

engineering, environmental,construction & building technology, civil