The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value Predicts the Survival of Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line ALK Inhibitor

Xinru Chen,Xiangchan Hong,Gang Chen,Jinhui Xue,Jie Huang,Fan Wang,Wael Ab Dullah Sultan Ali,Jing Li,Li Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101338
IF: 4.803
2022-01-01
Translational Oncology
Abstract:Background: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved the clinical outcomes of patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, reliable biomarkers to predict the prognostic role of this treatment are lacking. The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) has recently been demonstrated as a novel comprehensive biomarker to predict survival of patients with solid tumors. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic power of PIV in this group of patients. Patients and methods: 94 patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who received first-line ALK inhibitors were enrolled in this study. PIV was calculated as the product of peripheral blood neutrophil, monocyte, and platelet counts divided by lymphocyte count. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox hazard regression models were used for survival analyses. Results: The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 63.5%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 55.1%. Patients with higher PIV, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) had worse PFS in univariate analysis, but only the PIV (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-4.70, p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Similarly, patients with higher PIV, NLR, PLR, and SII had a worse OS in the univariate analysis, but only the PIV (HR = 4.70, 95% CI: 2.00-11.02, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: PIV is a comprehensive and convenient predictor of both PFS and OS in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who received first-line ALK TKIs. Prospective clinical trials are required to validate the value of this new parameter.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?