Fixed-Seat Rowing versus Sliding-Seat Rowing: Effects on Physical Fitness in Breast Cancer Survivors

Juan Gavala-González,Mateo Real-Pérez,Laura Benítez-García,José Fernández-García
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16122207
2024-06-14
Cancers
Abstract:This study aimed to analyze the effects of a team rowing-based training program on physical fitness and anthropometric parameters in female breast cancer survivors (n = 40; 56.78 ± 6.38 years). The participants were divided into two groups: one rowed in fixed-seat rowing (FSR) boats (n = 20; 56.35 ± 4.89 years), and the other rowed in sliding-seat rowing (SSR) boats (n = 20; 57.20 ± 7.7 years). Both groups engaged in two 75 min sessions per week for 24 weeks. Significant improvements were observed in both groups in terms of weight (FSR: −1.93 kg, SSR: −1.75 kg), body mass index (FSR: −0.73 kg/m2, SSR: −0.67 kg/m2), waist circumference (FSR: −2.83 cm, SSR: −3.66 cm), and hip circumference (FSR: −2.02 cm, SSR: −2.88 cm). Muscle strength improved in the lower extremities (jump test: FSR: 2.99 cm, SSR: 3.11 cm) and upper extremities (dominant: FSR: 4.13 kgf, SSR: 4.34 kgf; non-dominant: FSR: 3.67 kgf, SSR: 3.32 kgf). Aerobic capacity also improved, with the SSR group showing a greater increase (FSR: 63.05 m, SSR: 93.65 m). Flexibility tests revealed better results in the SSR group for both dominant (SSR: 1.75 cm vs. FSR: −5.55 cm) and non-dominant limbs (SSR: 1.72 cm vs. FSR: −3.81 cm). These findings suggest that the type of rowing modality can influence physical fitness outcomes, with the SSR group showing superior improvements compared to the FSR group.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?