An Ontogenic Study of Receptor Mechanisms by Which Acute Administration of Low-Doses of Methamphetamine Suppresses DOI-induced 5-Ht2a-receptor Mediated Head-Twitch Response in Mice

Sun Yina,Chebolu Seetha,Henry Denise,Lankireddy Sandeep,Darmani Nissar A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00686-5

2022-01-01

BMC Neuroscience

Abstract:Background Methamphetamine (MA) is a non-selective monoamine releaser and thus releases serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) from corresponding nerve terminals into synapses. DOI ((±)-2, 5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine) is a direct-acting serotonergic 5-HT 2A/C receptor agonist and induces the head-twitch response (HTR) via stimulation of 5-HT 2A receptor in mice. While more selective serotonin releasers such as d-fenfluramine evoke the HTR, monoamine reuptake blockers (e.g., cocaine) suppress the DOI-evoked HTR via indirect stimulation of serotonergic 5-HT 1A - and adrenergic ɑ 2 -receptors. Since the induction of HTR by DOI is age-dependent, we investigated whether: (1) during development MA can evoke the HTR by itself, and (2) acute pretreatment with either the selective 5-HT 2A receptor antagonist EMD 281014 or low-doses of MA can: (i) modulate the DOI-induced HTR in mice across postnatal days 20, 30 and 60, and (ii) alter the DOI-induced c- fos expression in mice prefrontal cortex (PFC). To further explore the possible modulatory effect of MA on DOI-induced HTR, we investigated whether blockade of inhibitory serotonergic 5-HT 1A - or adrenergic ɑ 2 -receptors by corresponding selective antagonists (WAY 100635 or RS 79948, respectively), can prevent the effect of MA on DOI-induced HTR during aging. Results Although neither EMD 281014 nor MA by themselves could evoke the HTR, acute pretreatment with either EMD 281014 (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) or MA (1, 2.5, 5 mg/kg, i.p.), dose-dependently suppressed the DOI-induced HTR across ages. While WAY 100635 significantly reversed the inhibitory effect of MA in 20- and 30-day old mice, RS 79948 failed to significantly counter MA’s inhibitory effect. Moreover, DOI significantly increased c- fos expressions in several PFC regions. EMD 281014 prevented the DOI-induced increases in c- fos expression. Despite the inhibitory effect of MA on DOI-induced HTR, MA alone or in combination with DOI, significantly increased c- fos expression in several regions of the PFC. Conclusion The suppressive effect of MA on the DOI-evoked HTR appears to be mainly due to functional interactions between the HTR-inducing 5-HT 2A receptor and the inhibitory 5-HT 1A receptor. The MA-induced increase in c- fos expression in different PFC regions may be due to MA-evoked increases in synaptic concentrations of 5-HT, NE and/or DA.