The clinical outcome of emergency superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery bypass in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion

Lei Guo,Li Yang,Chunling Li,Yi Zeng,Ruxiang Xu,Zhengyu Wang,Chonggui Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02257-0
IF: 2.8
2024-01-03
Neurosurgical Review
Abstract:The role of superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is contentious, with no evidence in patients with AIS and large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). We conducted a cohort study to assess emergency STA-MCA outcomes in AIS-LVO and a meta-analysis to evaluate STA-MCA outcomes in early AIS treatment. From January 2018 to March 2021, we consecutively recruited newly diagnosed AIS-LVO patients, dividing them into STA-MCA and non-STA-MCA groups. To evaluate the neurological status and outcomes, we employed the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) during the acute phase and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) during the follow-up period. Additionally, we conducted a meta-analysis encompassing all available clinical studies to assess the impact of STA-MCA on patients with AIS. In the cohort study (56 patients), we observed more significant neurological improvement in the STA-MCA group at two weeks (p = 0.030). However, there was no difference in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression identified the NIHSS at two weeks (OR: 0.840; 95% CI: 0.754–0.936, p = 0.002) as the most critical predictor of a good outcome. Our meta-analysis of seven studies indicated a 67% rate for achieving a good outcome (mRS < 3) at follow-up points (95% CI: 57%–77%, I 2 = 44.1%). In summary, while the meta-analysis suggested the potential role of STA-MCA bypass in mild to moderate AIS, our single-center cohort study indicated that STA-MCA bypass does not seem to improve the prognosis of patients who suffer from AIS-LVO.
surgery,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?