Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Introduction</h3><p>Drug safety research asks causal questions but relies on observational data. Confounding bias threatens the reliability of studies using such data. The successful control of confounding requires knowledge of variables called confounders affecting both the exposure and outcome of interest. Causal knowledge of dynamic biological systems is complex and challenging. Fortunately, computable knowledge mined from the literature may hold clues about confounders. In this paper, we tested the hypothesis that incorporating literature-derived confounders can improve causal inference from observational data.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>We introduce two methods (semantic vector-based and string-based confounder search) that query literature-derived information for confounder candidates to control, using SemMedDB, a database of computable knowledge mined from the biomedical literature. These methods search SemMedDB for confounders by applying semantic constraint search for indications treated by the drug (exposure), that are also known to cause the adverse event (outcome). We then include the literature-derived confounder candidates in statistical and causal models derived from free-text clinical notes. For evaluation, we use a reference dataset widely used in drug safety containing labeled pairwise relationships between drugs and adverse events and attempt to rediscover these relationships from a corpus of 2.2M NLP-processed free-text clinical notes. We employ standard adjustment and causal inference procedures to predict and estimate causal effects by informing the models with varying numbers of literature-derived confounders and instantiating the exposure, outcome, and confounder variables in the models with dichotomous EHR-derived data. Finally, we compare the results from applying these procedures with naive measures of association (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup> and reporting odds ratio) and with each other.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results and Conclusions</h3><p>We found semantic vector-based search to be superior to string-based search at reducing confounding bias. However, the effect of including more rather than fewer literature-derived confounders was inconclusive. We recommend using targeted learning estimation methods that can address treatment-confounder feedback, where confounders that also behave as intermediate variables, and engaging subject-matter experts to adjudicate the handling of problematic confounders.</p>

[Methods for Controlling Time-Varying Confounding in Pharmaco-Epidemiological Studies: a Systematic Reveiw].

Interventions and management on multimorbidity: An overview of systematic reviews.

Safe Medication Use Based on Knowledge of Information about Contraindications Concerning Cross Allergy and Comprehensive Clinical Intervention

Reporting, Handling, and Interpretation of Time-Varying Drug Treatments in Observational Studies Using Routinely Collected Healthcare Data.

Use of Sensitivity Analyses to Assess Uncontrolled Confounding from Unmeasured Variables in Observational, Active Comparator Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies: A Systematic Review

[Identification process of time-related bias in pharmacoepidemiologic research based on a scoping review]

Immortal Time Bias and Its Control in Pharmacoepidemiology Study

Overcoming Time-Varying Confounding in Self-Controlled Case Series with Active Comparators: Application and Recommendations

Instrumental variable analysis in the presence of unmeasured confounding

Handling time‐varying treatments in observational studies: A scoping review and recommendations

[Methods for Controlling and Evaluating Residual Confounding in the Association Analysis of Observational Study with a Multicenter Database].

Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance

How the clinical research community responded to the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the COVID-19 clinical studies in ClinicalTrials.gov

Interventional Pharmacoepidemiology: Origins, Current Status, and Future Possibilities

Measured and accounted-for confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: Some thoughts for practitioners

Two assumptions of the prior event rate ratio approach for controlling confounding can be evaluated by self-controlled case series and dynamic random intercept modelling

[Active Surveillance of Adverse Drug Reaction in the Era of Big Data: Challenge and Opportunity for Control Selection].

Quasi-experimental methods for pharmacoepidemiology: difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods with case studies for vaccine evaluation

Current trends in the application of causal inference methods to pooled longitudinal observational infectious disease studies—A protocol for a methodological systematic review

Grace periods and exposure misclassification in self-controlled case-series studies of drug-drug interactions

Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence