Anatomical study of modified incision and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury with direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty

尚希福,周宏博,陈敏,陈士文,罗正亮
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20210329-00089
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the anatomical characteristics of modified and classical incisions through the direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty and to provide an anatomical basis for avoiding the intraoperative injury of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN).Methods:The Department of Anatomy of Bengbu Medical College provided six specimens of the hip joint and femur of adult Chinese cadavers, which included two males with two sides and four females with four sides and were aged 48-72(61.7±8.2) years old. The DAA incision was performed via anatomical marker localization, and the starting point of the incision was all downward and outward 3 cm from the highest point of the anterior superior iliac spine. The classical incision in DAA was directed toward the prolongation of the fibular head. The extension direction of the modified incision was shifted outward and backward to the classical incision, and the offset angle was 1/2 of the angle between the highest point of the anterior superior iliac spine and the vertex of the fibula head and the greater trochanter of the femur. The LFCN and all its branches were revealed by anatomy (1) to observe the morphology of the LFCN and its relationship with the classical and modified DAA incisions; (2) to classify the LFCN; and (3) to measure the shortest distance between the classical and modified incisions in DAA and the LFCN to determine the anatomical relationship between the LFCN and the classical and modified incisions in DAA.Results:(1) The LFCN moved from the medial 0.8 cm of the anterior superior iliac spine to the anterior femur through the lower part of the inguinal ligament. The LFCN moved forward and outward almost parallel to the connection between the highest point of the anterior superior iliac spine and the fibula microcephalus. The classical DAA incision crossed the LFCN distally; such an approach might directly damage the LFCN. Extending the classical DAA incision will increase the probability of LFCN injury. No crossover occurred between the modified DAA incision and the LFCN. (2) The LFCN classifications of the six specimens were as follows: three sartorius types, two backward types, and one fan type. (3) The shortest distance between the modified incision of the LFCN and DAA was 1.2-2.4 (2.0±0.40) cm, and the shortest distance between the LFCN and the classical incision was 0-1.4 (0.98±0.55) cm. The shortest distance between the trunk and branch of the sartorius type and backward types of LFCN and the modified incision of in DAA was>2.0 cm. The sartorius and backward types of LFCN had no crossover with the classical DAA incision, and the shortest distance between all LFCN branches and the modified DAA incision was >0.7 cm. The fan-shaped LFCN intersected with the classical DAA incision. No crossover was observed between the modified DAA incision and the LFCN, and the shortest distance was 1.2 cm.Conclusions:In terms of anatomical relationship, the modified DAA incision is farther from the LFCN than the classical DAA incision, and the LFCN is less prone to injury in DAA in total hip arthroplasty.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?