Comparative analysis of research topics of Chinese and English COVID-19 studies based on VOS viewer and CiteSpace

Wang Yunhua,Pan Bei,Ge Long,Chen Yongcong,Wang Jiancheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13515/j.cnki.hnjpm.1006-8414.2021.03.006

2021-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare and analyze the hot topics of COVID-19 for Chinese and English studies using bibliometric visualization for promoting the development of studies on COVID-19. Methods The information of studies on COVID-19 was obtained by searching CNKI and PubMed databases. Two tools, VOSviewer 1.6.13 and CiteSpace 5.6.R4, were used to extract the included authors, institutions and keywords, and generate the cooperative network graph of high-productivity authors, the cooperative network graph of institutions, and clustering graph of high-frequency keywords. Results 2 744 studies were included, including 1 561 in Chinese and 1 183 in English. Four of the top 10 Chinese authors were from Peking University Third Hospital.Three of the top 10 English authors were from the UK and seven were from China. The main Chinese and foreign authors formed four groups each, with little cooperation between the groups. There was a lack of cooperation among the major institutions for Chinese literature publication, while the major institutions for English literature publication were mostly from China and have cooperative relations with the United States. The studies on COVID-19 had 5 themes in Chinese and 4 themes in English. Conclusions The UK and China are in a relatively leading position in the research of this field. The members of each team work closely together, but there is a lack of cross-team cooperation. Different countries and regions should strengthen exchanges and cooperation and learn from each other. Research on COVID-19 focuses on the prevention and control of outbreaks, treatment,etc, but English research also focuses on the origin of COVID-19.