Clinical efficacy of Pipeline embolization device in the treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms

刘恋,姜除寒,李佑祥,刘鹏,杨新健,吕明,张宇鹏,尤为,马超
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20200315-00125
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the efficacy and complications of Pipeline embolization device (PED) in the treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 14 patients with recurrent intracranial aneurysms who were treated with PED at Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2016 to April 2019. Of the 14 patients, 10 were treated with PED alone, and 4 with PED combined with coils. All patients were followed up, the outcome was evaluated according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and the embolization outcome of aneurysm was evaluated by imaging [digital subtraction angiography(DSA)] follow-up.Results:Fifteen PEDs were successfully implanted in 14 patients. All PEDs were positioned in place. DSA examination immediately after the procedure showed that the blood flow in the aneurysms was retained and the branches of the parent vessel were unobstructed. Dyna CT examination showed that the stents covered the neck of the aneurysm accurately and were anchored well. Postprocedural complications occurred in 2 patients, including 1 case of cerebral infarction, which recovered after antiplatelet aggregation therapy, and 1 case died after midbrain hemorrhage. All 13 surviving patients were followed up for a median period of 21.0 months (range: 12-48 months). There was no cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, and no new neurological deficits were reported. The mRS scores of all patients were 0 at the latest follow-up. Eleven patients were followed up for a median of 6 months (range: 3-16 months). Complete embolization of aneurysm was achieved in 8 patients, including 1 case of aneurysmal recurrence after coil embolization alone, 3 cases of recurrence after surgical clipping, 3 cases of recurrence after stent-assisted coil embolization and 1 case of recurrence after stent implantation. Residual of aneurysm neck was reported in 2 cases, both of which had recurrence after stent-assisted coil embolization. Residual of the aneurysm body was reported in 1 case of recurrence after stent-assisted coil embolization.Conclusion:The treatment outcome with PED in patients with recurrent aneurysms after coil embolization or surgical clipping seems good, while the efficacy of PED in the treatment of recurrent aneurysms after stent implantation remains to be further verified.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?