Comparison of Patterson and modified Hennigan Classification in amniotic band syndrome and case review

徐秀玥,方有生,刘宇洲,劳杰,傅晓晏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn311653-20201025-00357
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of Patterson and modified Hennigan Classification in amniotic band syndrome and review the features of 21 cases.Methods:From January 2019 to April 2020, 21 cases of amniotic band syndrome were enrolled. Basic information of the patients were recorded, medical history was reviewed to record the conditions on the affected limbs. The Patterson and modified Hennigan Classification were used on these patients separately to compare the features of these two classification systems. Then data were collected and calculated to have a brief view of the status of affected limbs.Results:Twenty-one cases were enrolled, including 7 boys and 14 girls. In 9 cases, only upper limbs were affected. In 5 cases, only lower limbs were affected. In 7 cases, both upper and lower limbs were affected. In 16 cases with upper limbs affected (18 limbs), one different Patterson classification was counted as 1. In these cases, 13 of Patterson type 2, 5 of type 3 and 5 of type 4 were included. There were 16 fingers of type 3, including 6 index-middle finger acrosyndactyly, 6 middle-ring finger acrosyndactyly and 4 ring-little finger acrosyndactyly. 13 fingers of type 4 were seen, including 6 index fingers, 4 middle fingers, 1 thumb, 1 ring finger and 1 little finger. In the same way, in 12 cases with lower limbs affected (15 limbs), 13 of Patterson type 2, 2 of type 3 and 5 of type 4 were included. 2 of type 3 were seen, including 2nd to 5th toe acrosyndactyly and 3rd to 5th toe acrosyndactyly. Besides on one amputation at the ankle level, there were 13 toes of type 4 affected, including 3 of 1st, 2nd, 3rd toes separately and 2 of 4th, 5th toes separately. While using modified Hennigan Classification, one different classification was also counted as 1. 10 finger of zone 1 (finger), 1 of zone 2 (palm), 7 of zone 3 (forearms) and 2 of zone 4 (arms) were affected in all upper limbs. 1 of zone 1 (thigh), 11 of zone 2 (shanks) and 4 of zone (toe) were affected in all lower limbs.Conclusion:The Patterson and modified Hennigan Classification system in amniotic band syndrome can be combined to clearly reflect the location and severity of the disease, facilitate the guidance of treatment and data statistics, and provide reliable data resources for future research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?