Long-term Results of Endovascular Reconstruction for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.
Min Yang,Bihui Zhang,Guochen Niu,Ziguang Yan,Xiaoqiang Tong,Yinghua Zou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-599
2021-01-01
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Open surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Endovascular therapy has emerged as an attractive alternative for AIOD due to its minimal invasiveness. The aims of the present study were to investigate the long-term patency of endovascular treatment and to compare the outcomes of Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) A/B and C/D lesions.METHODS:Patients with AIOD (n=156) were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Patency rates were assessed at 12, 36, and 60 months after the procedure. Parameters for comparisons between TASC II A/B and C/D lesions included primary patency, secondary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), the technical success rate, the rate of complications, and risk factors for in-stent restenosis.RESULTS:For all patients, the technical success rate was 98.7%, the complication rate was 4.5%, and the mean follow-up period was 35.7 months. At 12, 36, and 60 months after the procedure, the primary patency rates were 96.5%, 88.3%, and 80.4%, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 99%, 96.4%, and 88%, respectively. The rates of freedom from TLR were 97.5%, 91.6%, and 89.6%. No significant differences were observed between A/B and C/D lesions in terms of primary patency (P=0.443), secondary patency (P=0.393), or freedom from TLR (P=0.481).CONCLUSIONS:Endovascular reconstruction is effective and safe for AIOD, and should be the first-line treatment option for patients with TASC II A-D aortoiliac lesions.