A single-center retrospective study of the patients with advanced or metastatic leiomyosarcoma in the treatment of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy

郭曦,周宇红,申锋,刘文帅,庄荣源,张晨璐,王志明,游洋
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101548-20201125-00172
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination treatment with anlotinib and chemotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic leiomyosarcoma.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS at 24 weeks, 1-year survival rate and adverse events of patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma in the treatment of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy in our center from January 2018 to December 2019. Meanwhile, the factors associated with efficacy were explored. The chemotherapy regimens were classified into dacarbazine plus epirubicin (DE) and the others (non DE), including epirubicin and/or gemcitabine, docetaxel, ifosfamide and so on. The short-term efficacy was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Meanwhile, adverse events were recorded.Results:Among 43 patients in this cohort, 6 males and 37 females with a median age of 51 years recieved first-line therapy in 34 patients and second-line in 9 cases. The median follow-up time was 16 months. The ORR was 19%, with a DCR of 88%. The median PFS was 8.8 months, and the PFS at 24 weeks was 65%. The 1-year survival rate was 86%. Univariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in median PFS among different subgroups, including age, primary site, FNCLCC classification and the lines and regimens of therapy. The common treatment-related adverse events were bone marrow suppression, nausea, vomiting, hypertension and oral mucositis, which was mainly at grade 1 to 2. Only 4 patients had severe adverse event, which was febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related death was observed.Conclusions:The ORR of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma was not significantly improved. However, the DCR, the median PFS and the 1-year survival rate were satisfactory. The adverse reactions were tolerable. Further prospective clinical studies are warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?