Comparison of the efficacy between Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in vitreous cavity and in anterior chamber for the treatment of secondary glaucoma after vitrectomy

赵英迪,朱俊,解正高
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116022-20200718-00157
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the efficacy of two methods of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation’ in vitreous cavity and in anterior chamber’ for the treatment of secondary glaucoma after vitrectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 23 eyes of 23 patients with secondary glaucoma after vitrectomy from Jan.2015 to Oct.2019 in Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All cases underwent Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with two methods.In anterior chamber group, 12 eyes of 12 cases were treated with drainage tube inserted through limbus.In vitreous cavity group, 11 eyes of 11 cases were treated with drainage tube inserted into vitreous cavity through pars plana.The patients were followed up for 4-32 months and the efficacy of the two groups were compared.Results:The operative time of vitreous cavity group was (31.88±5.30) minutes, which was less than (45.63±8.63) minutes of anterior chamber group ( t=3.838, P=0.002). The success rate in the anterior chamber group and the vitreous group was 75.00%(9/12) and 81.81%(9/11), respectively.The post-operative IOP were significantly lower than the pre-operative IOP in both groups (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at each time points (all P>0.05). No serious complication occurred in two groups. Conclusion:Both Ahmed glaucoma valve implanted in vitreous cavity and in anterior chamber can control the secondary glaucoma after vitrectomy safely and effectively, but the former is more convenient and time-saving.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?