Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effect of three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.Methods The retrospective cohort study was adopted.The clinical data of 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer at the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March 2014 to November 2015 were collected.Forty-two patients undergoing 2D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer between March 2014 and December 2014 were allocated into the 2D group and 41 patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer between January 2015 and November 2015 were allocated into the 3D group.All the patients in the 2 groups underwent 2D or 3D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer based on the principles of lymph node dissection and tumor-free survival.Observation indicators included:(1) surgical situations:operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,number of lymph node dissected,(2) postoperative recovery:recovery time of gastrointestinal function,postoperative complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay,hospital expenses,(3) postoperative pathological situations:length of colorectal specimens,distance from tumor to distal incision margin,(4) follow-up.All the patients were followed up to detect postoperative survival,tumor metastasis and recurrence using outpatient examination and telephone interview up to March 2016.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as x-± s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test.Count data were analyzed using chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.Results (1) Surgical situations:all the patients underwent successful laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer,without conversion to open surgery and perioperative death.Operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss and number of lymph node dissected were (171 ±18) minutes,(112±18)mL,14.0 ± 1.4 in the 2D group and (125 ± 13) minutes,(101 ± 16)mL,14.6 ± 0.9 in the 3D group,respectively,with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t =-13.091,-2.962,-3.623,P ＜0.05).(2) Postoperative recovery:recovery time of gastrointestinal function was (3.0 ± 0.6) days in the 2D group and (3.0 ± 0.6) days in the 3D group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =3.423,P ＞ 0.05).Incidence of postoperative complications in the 2D and 3D groups was 7.1％ (3/42) and 4.9％ (2/41),respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P ＞0.05).One,1,1 patients in the 2D group were respectively complicated with anastomotic fistula,intra-abdominal hemorrhage and intra-abdominal infection,1 and 1 patients in the 3D group were respectively complicated with anastomotic fistula and intestinal paralysis,and they were improved by symptomatic treatment.Duration of postoperative hospital stay and hospital expenses was (10.0 ±0.8)days,(7.0 ± 1.4) × 104 yuan in the 2D group and (10.0 ±0.6)days,(7.3 ± 1.5) x 104 yuan in the 3D group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =15.716,0.941,P ＞ 0.05).(3)Postoperative pathological situations:length of colorectal specimens and distance from tumor to distal incision margin were (18 ± 7) cm,(4.7 ± 0.6) cm in the 2D group and (20 ± 8) cm,(4.9 ± 0.7)cm in the 3D group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =0.742,1.401,P ＞0.05).(4)Follow-up:of 83 patients,82 were followed up for 5-24 months with a median time of 12 months.During the follow-up,there was no occurrence of tumor-related death and recurrence and metastasis of sites of puncture.Intra-abdominal tumor recurrence,recurrence of anastomotic tumor and tumor distant metastasis were detected in 3,2,1 patients in the 2D group and 2,1,1 patients in the 3D group,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with 2D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer,3D laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer is safe and feasible,and it can also reduce intraoperative blood loss and increase the rate of lymph node dissected,with a good short-term outcome.

Short-term outcomes of three-dimensional vs two-dimensional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Case-Matched Studies

Meta-analysis of efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocarcinoma.

Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Outcomes Compared with Conventional Open Surgery.

Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Comparative Study with Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy at a High-Volume Center

Laparoscopic Versus Open Major Hepatectomy For Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopy in Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes after 3D laparoscopic and robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter comparative study

Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of 3D and 2D laparoscopy: initial experience of perioperative outcomes and clinical assessment

Comparison of 3D Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with a 2D Procedure for Gastric Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.

Long-term and short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: might laparoscopic approach be better in early HCC?

Case-matched study of short-term effects of 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

[Comparative Study of Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic C1 Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer].

Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anatomical Versus Non-Anatomical Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Comparison between 3D and 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer treatment

Effect Analysis of Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Impact of three-dimensional reconstruction visualization technology on short- and long-term outcomes after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity‐score‐matched and inverse probability of treatment‐weighted multicenter study

Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Three-Dimensional Visualized Medical Techniques Hepatectomy for Liver Cancer with and without the Treatment of Sorafenib

Under the Guidance of the Concept of Precise Anatomical Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma