Detecting Opportunistic Behavior in Public Short Campaigns

Danqi Hu

2018-01-01

Abstract:The high hurdles in proving short campaigns to be illegal manipulation, as well as the possibility of the transgressor claiming “honest errors,” leave room for opportunistic short campaign behavior. Motivated by the theory of Benabou and Laroque (1992), this paper proposes an empirical approach to detect such behavior. Using comprehensive data on short campaigns and linking them to daily short-sale metrics and post-campaign stock market performance, I find a greater presence of opportunistic behavior when campaigns are clustered, that is, when multiple campaigns are published on the same target at the same time. I further find that the evidence suggesting clustered campaigns are more opportunistic concentrates in the subsamples where target firms are more prone to price manipulation, campaign authors are better connected, and authors’ reputation concerns are lower.