Sucralose, a Persistent Artificial Sweetener in the Urban Water Cycle: Insights into Occurrence, Chlorinated Byproducts Formation, and Human Exposure
Yulong Yang,Zhanghua Liu,Huiming Zheng,Shicui Zhu,Kejia Zhang,Xueyan Li,Xiaoyan Ma,Andrea M. Dietrich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105293
IF: 7.7
2021-01-01
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Abstract:As a globally important artificial sweetener, sucralose (SUC) is a persistent emerging contaminant in global aquatic environments. This research comprehensively track the fate and transport of SUC throughout an urban water cycle; to perform laboratory experiments to determine chlorinated disinfection by-products (DBPs) of SUC sebsequent to advanced oxidation with ozone; and to perform a risk evaluation of SUC related DBPs.; The results demonstrated that SUC was consistently present throughout the urban water cycle, including consumer's tap water. The inluent to the municipal wastewater treatment plant contained 1033.4-2626.3 ng/L SUC, and as expected for this non-biodegradable artificial sweetener, the concentration in the effluent was slightly reduced to 917.6-2031.2 ng/L. The concentration of SUC varied in surface waters with a peak value of 2070.0 ng/L. In finished drinking water 288.1-505.3 ng/L SUC was found, and values of 177.7-409.7 ng/L were present in the distribution system. Up to 16.3% of SUC concentration discharged as municipal wastewater was delivered to residents in their drinking water. While conventional treatment little removed SUC, the mean removal efficiency of SUC with ozonation followed by activated carbon filtration was 39.6% at a full-scale drinking water treatment plant. The fate and transformation of SUC in drinking water treated by ozonation and chlorination were investigated in laboratory experiments. Ozonation partially degraded SUC; however, intermediates reacted with chlorine to generate DBPs, including trichloromethane (TCM), dichloroacetic acid (DCAA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCAA). Peak 7-days potential formation of TCM, DCAA and TCAA were 0.016, 0.51 and 23.34 mu g/mg SUC, respectively. DBP yields increased with increasing chlorine dosage, chlorination time, temperature, and solution pH. The presence of ammonia nitrogen in water facilitated dichloroacetonitrile (DCAN) production up to 0.78 mu g/mg SUC, while simultaneously reducing the yield of TCM, DCAA and TCAA. Human exposure analysis revealed that carcinogenic risks of DBPs caused only by SUC ozonation were in the range of 1.86 x 10(-12)-6.12 x 10(-9), while non-carcinogenic risks were in the range of 6.0 x 10(-9)-4.37 x 10(-6). The pervasive occurrence of SUC in an urban water cycle, couple to its resistance to biological and chemical treatment, confirms that SUC is a persistent contaminant in the aquatic system, including tap water.