The Effects of Dietary Nutrients and Physical Activity on Charlson Comorbidity Index Using Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Model: NHANES 2013–2014

Hantong Zhao,Changcong Wang,Yingan Pan,Yinpei Guo,N. Yao,Han Wang,Lina Jin,Bo Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.14437/v1
2019-01-01
Abstract:Background: In recent years, chronic medical conditions have gradually became the dominant cause of death and disability, which combined with the increasing life expectancy, leading to multimorbidity became an increasingly serious global public health challenge. However, most existing studies have focused on the coexistence of specific diseases or relatively few diseases. Given one person may have various diseases at the same time, we applied Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to synthetically evaluate one's 10-year mortality. In this study, we explored the effects of nutrients and physical activity on one's 10-year mortality using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014 data.Methods: The study sample consists of one continuous cycle (2013–2014) of NHANES, and 4386 eligible subjects were included in the study. We utilized zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression to investigate the effects in nutrients and physical activity on CCI by adjusting seven baseline covariates (age, gender, race, education, income, smoking and drinking). Results: In Part 1 of the model, taking an extra gram of niacin resulted in 1.621 times of CCI versus eating less (RR=1.621, p=0.016). Conversely, lutein and zeaxanthin have a negative correlation with CCI (RR=0.974, p=0.031). Besides, sedentary time was also concerned significantly with CCI (RR=1.035, p=0.005). Moreover, those who do not have vigorous work activity would be more likely to have higher CCI than those who have (RR=1.275, P=0.045). In Part 2 of the model, those who do not have vigorous recreational activity have 0.541 times of taking CCI scored zero versus those who have (OR=0.541, p=0.004), and those who do not have moderate recreational activity have 0.708 times of taking CCI equals zero versus those who have (OR=0.708, p=0.017).Conclusions: With the increasing intakes of niacin, participants were more likely to suffer from chronic diseases. However, lutein and zeaxanthin might have beneficial impact on individuals’ health and decrease mortality. In the respect of physical activity, the death rate among people who have higher sedentary time and do not have vigorous work activity will be more likely to increase. In addition, persons do not have vigorous or moderate physical activity have the risk of death compared with those who have.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?