More Conservative Rehabilitation Strategy Within Postoperative 6 Month for All-Inside Reconstruction Compared with Anatomical Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament May Be Able to Achieve Better Stability: Based on the Study of Graft Maturity

Rubing Lin,Qiuwen Zhong,Xiao Wu,Lei Cui,Rong Huang,Qi Deng,Changqing Jiang,Wei Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-989313/v1

2021-01-01

Abstract:Background: Individualized rehabilitation based on graft maturity is necessary to optimize patient function and prevent graft re-injury. But there is a lack of studies on graft maturity in the all-inside single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hypothesis/Purpose: Compared to the difference in graft maturity, functional scores, and stability between all-inside and anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, it was assumed that the stability of all-inside reconstruction is relatively insufficient, and its graft maturity is worse than the anatomical reconstruction. Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods : Fifty-four patients were recruited in this study and randomly assigned to the all-inside reconstruction group (n = 27) and the anatomical reconstruction group (n = 27) using the same rehabilitation strategy. The Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Lysholm score were recorded at postoperative 3 rd , 6 th , and 12 th month to assess functional recovery. Magnetic resonance imaging was conducted to measure the Signal/Noise quotient (SNQ) of the intra-articular graft to observe the maturity. Stability was assessed using GNRB relaxation measuring instrument at the postoperative 12 th month. Results : The graft SNQ of the all-inside group was significantly higher than that in the anatomical group during the postoperative 6 th month ( p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in graft SNQ between the two groups at postoperative 3 rd and 12 th month ( p > 0.05). Both groups exhibited the graft’s highest SNQ in the middle region, followed by the proximal region, and the lowest was the distal region. Functional scores improved significantly in both groups and had no statistical difference ( p > 0.05). The stability recovered well in both groups during the postoperative 12 th month, but the GNRB relaxation was higher in the all-inside group ( p < 0.05). There was no correlation between functional scores and graft maturity in the two groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusions: All-inside reconstruction graft maturity is inferior to the anatomical reconstruction during postoperative 6 th month, which may cause relatively insufficient stability of all-inside reconstruction compared with anatomical reconstruction under the same rehabilitation strategy. A more conservative rehabilitation strategy for all-inside reconstruction around the postoperative 6 th month may achieve better stability.